1978
DOI: 10.1148/126.2.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Joint Space in Normal Hip Radiographs

Abstract: The hip joint space in standard anteroposterior images of 120 normal subjects was measured with the aid of a special transparent pattern. The normal value was slightly over 4mm, scattered between 3 and 5 mm, except for elderly men in whom values of 6 mm or more may be normal. The lower borderline value does not change with age, nor is there any change in the average joint space with age except in men in whom it increases slightly. A narrow joint space in an elderly patient should not be expected simply because… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our results differ from those of previous studies (4,5), they are from a much larger sample of men and women and are likely to be more robust through the exclusion of subjects both with hip pain and with any degree of structural change. Clearly, there are limitations to a cross-sectional study; therefore, the results cannot be definitely assumed to imply that aging itself causes a reduction in joint space.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although our results differ from those of previous studies (4,5), they are from a much larger sample of men and women and are likely to be more robust through the exclusion of subjects both with hip pain and with any degree of structural change. Clearly, there are limitations to a cross-sectional study; therefore, the results cannot be definitely assumed to imply that aging itself causes a reduction in joint space.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…20 The mean joint space in the present material decreased slightly with age (fig2), and was 0.3 mm less in women than in men in all age groups (fig 2). In contrast, a previous study37 found a slight increase in joint space with age, and no difference in joint space between men and women. The latter study, however, excluded any hips with signs of OA.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Differences in positioning of the measurement points across observers possibly contributed to the poor interobserver agreement, which was evaluated on the basis of both measurement point positioning and cartilage thickness measurement. The same measurement points were used in previous studies on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip or on three-dimensional MR images (15,17,18,22,23). The 130°neck shaft angle that determines the position of the apical point varies somewhat across individuals but was used for all measurements in each hip and, therefore, did not affect comparisons within a given hip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%