The Joint Ministerial Decree (SKB) of Islamic Defenders Front (FPI): Quo Vadis The Rule of Law and Human Rights?

Disantara, Fradhana Putra

doi:10.35724/mularev.v3i2.3572

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ketiga, kajian mengenai Putusan MK Cipta Kerja dikaitkan dengan lahirnya UU Cipta Kerja menjadi penting karena UU sebagai produk kekuasaan eksekutif dalam kondisi kedaruratan hukum, tentu memiliki tendensi sikap subjektif presiden sebagai lembaga yang berwenang mengeluarkan UU. 13 Sikap subjektif presiden harus diuji dan dinilai khususnya dalam koridor hukum yang dalam ini berupa Putusan MK Cipta Kerja. 14 Hal ini menegaskan, sekalipun sesuai dengan Pasal 22 UUD NRI 1945 Presiden adalah lembaga yang berwenang mengeluarkan UU, namun kewenangan tersebut tetap wajib tunduk pada aspek hukum, khususnya Putusan MK Cipta Kerja.…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 31 Eksistensi Putusan Mk Cipta Kerja Pa...unclassified

Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Penetapan Perpu Cipta Kerja

Suhardin

Flora

2023

JULR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims at analyzing the existence of Constitutional Court Ruling No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 (Job Creation MK Decision) after Law No. 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. This research is a normative legal research by prioritizing case approaches, concepts, and legislation. The results of the study confirmed that the existence of the Job Creation MK Decision after the passage of the Job Creation Law was as if the Job Creation MK Decision was between "there and not". It is said that there is because it is used as a juridical basis in the Job Creation Law, however substantively the Decision of the Job Creation MK, especially the constitutional order to substantively improve the Job Creation Law by involving meaningful community participation, has not been implemented. Because, the government (in this case the President) actually uses the Job Creation Law instrument which substantively denies the Job Creation MK Decision. The legal implications of the Job Creation MK Decision after the Job Creation Law was passed is that the Job Creation Law has actually violated the substance of the Job Creation MK Decision. It can be seen that the Job Creation MK Decision orients the reformulation of the Job Creation Law through meaningful participation involving all components of society. The existence of disobedience to the Job Creation Law against the Decision of the Job Creation MK has the potential to cause a phenomenon of disregard for the constitution (constitutional disobedience). Therefore, in the future it is necessary to formulate the forms and types of sanctions against the Constitutional Court's Decision and also be oriented to the Constitutional Court being able to review a Law or UU that contradicts the Constitutional Court's Decision. Penelitian ini bertujuan pada analisis atas eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 (Putusan MK Cipta Kerja) pasca disahkannya UU No. 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengedepankan pendekatan kasus, konsep, dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa eksistensi Putusan MK Cipta Kerja pasca disahkannya UU Cipta Kerja seolah-olah Putusan MK Cipta Kerja adalah antara “ada dan tiada”. Dikatakan ada karena dijadikan landasan yuridis dalam UU Cipta Kerja akan tetapi secara substantif Putusan MK Cipta Kerja khususnya perintah konstitusional untuk memperbaiki UU Cipta Kerja secara substantif dengan melibatkan partisipasi masyarakat secara bermakna, justru tidak dilaksanakan. Pemerintah (dalam hal ini Presiden) justru menggunakan instrumen UU Cipta Kerja yang secara substantif mengingkari Putusan MK Cipta Kerja. Implikasi hukum Putusan MK Cipta Kerja pasca disahkannya UU Cipta Kerja adalah bahwa UU Cipta Kerja sejatinya telah melanggar substansi dari Putusan MK Cipta Kerja. Hal ini dapat dilihat bahwa Putusan MK Cipta Kerja mengorientasikan perumusan ulang UU Cipta Kerja melalui partisipasi yang bermakna dengan melibatkan segenap komponen masyarakat. Adanya ketidaktaatan UU Cipta Kerja terhadap Putusan MK Cipta Kerja berpotensi membuat adanya fenomena pengabaian terhadap konstitusi (constitutional disobedience). Oleh karena itu, ke depan perlu diformulasikan bentuk dan jenis sanksi terhadap Putusan MK serta diorientasikan pula MK dapat melakukan pengujian terhadap suatu undang-undang atau UU yang bertentangan dengan Putusan MK.

show abstract

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 31 Eksistensi Putusan Mk Cipta Kerja Pa...unclassified

Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Penetapan Perpu Cipta Kerja

Suhardin

Flora

2023

JULR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It deals with the issue of human rights being protected by a patchwork of different legal systems [8]. Universal principles are weakened when there are contradictions in interpretation and in application [9]. Cultural differences add another layer of difficulty to enforcement and may even violate basic rights.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Legal Contexts for the Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis

Yadav,

Singh,

Indravesh

2023

J. of Law and Sust. Develop.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Human rights protection in today's globalized world necessitates familiarity with a wide range of legal systems. Human rights protection laws all throughout the world are compared and contrasted in this research. While human rights apply to every nation, they are complicated and are often codified in diverse ways. The research presented here emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of these distinctions to ensure the survival of human rights and nature rights, human dignity, and justice. There are several obstacles to overcome when negotiating these legal terrains. Challenges arise from factors including divergent meanings, incomplete plans, cultural differences, and the ever-changing digital landscape. Method: The present research proposes a Synthesized Cultural Legal Frameworks (SCLF) for Universal Human Rights Protection as a means to provide universal human rights protection. This method is an attempt to recognize cultural differences while still achieving a worldwide approach to protecting human rights through a harmonized interpretation of the law. Result: This research has implications for policymakers, diplomats, lawyers, and activist organizations. This in-depth examination aids in gaining a better understanding of the intricate worldwide legal framework underlying environment and human rights. Conclusion: The research makes projections about the future of international collaboration, the success of legal harmonization initiatives, and global human rights results by modelling hypothetical situations based on possible legal harmonization efforts. Strategic planning and well-considered decision-making benefit from this dynamic method. The simulation analysis is based on the societal and economic effects and the efforts to harmonize the law.

show abstract

“…The state aims to bring prosperity and happiness to its people, and the law is the means by which it achieves that end. Thus, the law has the duty to regulate the peaceful association of human life and uphold the principle of justice in society (Disantara, 2021). Theoretically, law is directed at creating fair conditions for all individuals in society (Tesón, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Cases of Murder Based on Infidelity

Sidiq,

Ibrahim,

Binti Abdullah Suhaimi

2023

IJHLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study discusses the judge's consideration in deciding the criminal case of murder based on infidelity based on the judge's consideration of Article 338 of the Criminal Code Decision Number 88/Pid.B/2022/PN. The research uses normative juridical methods by examining primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that the judge's consideration included both juridical and non-juridical aspects that influenced the final decision. The defendant is considered accountable for his actions, taking into account various factors such as the confession of guilt, the defendant's attitude in the trial, and previous legal experience. In addition, the defendant's actions and their impact on victims and society are also important factors in the judge's deliberations.

show abstract

The Joint Ministerial Decree (SKB) of Islamic Defenders Front (FPI): Quo Vadis The Rule of Law and Human Rights?

Cited by 7 publications

References 51 publications

Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Penetapan Perpu Cipta Kerja

Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Penetapan Perpu Cipta Kerja

Global Legal Contexts for the Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis

Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Cases of Murder Based on Infidelity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About