2017
DOI: 10.1186/s41546-017-0020-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The joint impact of bankruptcy costs, fire sales and cross-holdings on systemic risk in financial networks

Abstract: which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Abstract The paper presents a comprehensive model of a banking system that integrates network effects, bankruptcy costs, fire sales, and cross-holdings. For the integrated financial market we prove the existence of a price-payment equilibrium and design an algorithm for the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic risk and financial contagion has been studied in a network of interbank payments by [12]. We refer to [20] for a review of this payment network model and extensions thereof to include, e.g., bankruptcy costs. The focus of this paper is on price-mediated contagion and fire sales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic risk and financial contagion has been studied in a network of interbank payments by [12]. We refer to [20] for a review of this payment network model and extensions thereof to include, e.g., bankruptcy costs. The focus of this paper is on price-mediated contagion and fire sales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to compare this model with prior notions of fire sales in the Eisenberg and Noe [2001] framework, e.g. Weber and Weske [2017]. In such works, all obligations are denominated in the same (cash) asset and illiquid assets are sold at a discount in order to cover these cash shortfalls.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a default of node 0 were desired, this could be included by stressing the initial endowments of the n firms. We will introduce a modified version of the fictitious default algorithm from Eisenberg and Noe [2001], Rogers and Veraart [2013], Weber and Weske [2017], Amini et al [2016], Feinstein [2017] for the construction of the greatest portfolio holdings y ↑ (q) under price q ∈ R m ++ . In particular, as with the prior fictitious default algorithms, this algorithm will converge after at most n iterations since the set of defaulting banks is monotonic.…”
Section: Financial Contagion Without Market Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the Bank of England has extended this model to analyse solvency contagion in the UK financial system (Bardoscia et al (2017)). Multiple, extensions of this model have been developed to include effects such as • Bankruptcy costs: Elsinger (2009), Rogers and Veraart (2013), Elliott et al (2014), Glasserman and Young (2015), Weber and Weske (2017),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%