2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The joint evolutionary histories of Wolbachia and mitochondria in Hypolimnas bolina

Abstract: Background: The interaction between the Blue Moon butterfly, Hypolimnas bolina, and Wolbachia has attracted interest because of the high prevalence of male-killing achieved within the species, the ecological consequences of this high prevalence, the intensity of selection on the host to suppress the infection, and the presence of multiple Wolbachia infections inducing different phenotypes. We examined diversity in the co-inherited marker, mtDNA, and the partitioning of this between individuals of different inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter ranges that produced an advantage for MSD species in our simulations overlap with those quantified from many empirical studies. Genetic cytoplasmic distorters normally exhibit perfect maternal vertical transmission, and near‐perfect or perfect transmission rates near have been documented in parasitic systems as well (Charlat et al., 2009; Jiggins, Randerson, Hurst, & Majerus, 2002). While some distorters are capable of completely feminizing broods, many distorters have more modest impacts, and distorter brood sex ratios frequently range from 60% to 80% female (Hassan, Idris, & Majerus, 2012; Mercot et al., 1995; Rigaud et al., 1999; Vala, Van Opijnen, Breeuwer, & Sabelis, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter ranges that produced an advantage for MSD species in our simulations overlap with those quantified from many empirical studies. Genetic cytoplasmic distorters normally exhibit perfect maternal vertical transmission, and near‐perfect or perfect transmission rates near have been documented in parasitic systems as well (Charlat et al., 2009; Jiggins, Randerson, Hurst, & Majerus, 2002). While some distorters are capable of completely feminizing broods, many distorters have more modest impacts, and distorter brood sex ratios frequently range from 60% to 80% female (Hassan, Idris, & Majerus, 2012; Mercot et al., 1995; Rigaud et al., 1999; Vala, Van Opijnen, Breeuwer, & Sabelis, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, relatively complete scenarios explaining natural infection frequencies are available in very few cases, including: (1) the w Ri infection in D. simulans , which is maintained at a high level (about 93%) in most populations by a balance between fairly intense CI but imperfect maternal transmission (Turelli & Hoffmann 1991, 1995; Carrington et al 2011; Kriesner et al 2013); (2) the infections in the mosquitoes Culex pipiens (Barr 1980; Rasgon & Scott 2003) and Ae. albopictus (Kittayapong et al 2002) that produce complete CI and exhibit essentially perfect maternal infection, so that almost all individuals in nature are infected; (3) the monomorphic infections in the D. paulistorum species complex, which cause CI, contribute to assortative mating and have evolved to obligate mutualism while persisting through cladogenesis (Miller et al 2010); (4) the imperfectly transmitted male-killing (MK) strain in D. innubila that confers a selective advantage of about 5% and is maintained at ∼35% infection frequency (Dyer et al 2004); and (5) the MK infection in the butterfly Hypolimnas bolina , which shows both high infection frequency and transmission efficiency (Charlat et al 2009). In other species, such as D. melanogaster and D. yakuba , we know that Wolbachia persists despite imperfect maternal transmission and no appreciable reproductive manipulation (Harcombe & Hoffmann 2004; Charlat et al 2004; but the fitness benefits maintaining the infection are not known with certainty, although plausible candidates exist (Teixeira et al 2008; Brownlie et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Charlat et al (2009), Dasmahapatra et al (2010), Muñoz et al (2011), Mutanen et al (2012), Nieukerken et al (2012) and Ritter et al (2013). In U. rhododendronalis and U. austriacalis , geographically well-separated COI groups are found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%