2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2748-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Joint Effects of Justice Climate, Group Moral Identity, and Corporate Social Responsibility on the Prosocial and Deviant Behaviors of Groups

Abstract: Pulling from theories of social exchange, deonance, and fairness heuristics, this study focuses on the relationship between overall justice climate and both the prosocial and deviant behaviors of groups. Specifically, it considers two contextual boundary conditions on this effect-corporate social responsibility (CSR) and group moral identity. Results from a laboratory experiment are presented, which show a significant effect for overall justice climate and a two-way interaction between overall justice climate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() show that, when employees sense that external stakeholders’ well‐being is favored over their own, they perceive corporate hypocrisy, which leads to greater emotional exhaustion and employee turnover. In this line, Thornton and Rupp () observe more deviant behaviors (i.e. stealing) when the overall justice climate appears unfair and external CSR is highly developed.…”
Section: Exchange‐related (Performing) Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…() show that, when employees sense that external stakeholders’ well‐being is favored over their own, they perceive corporate hypocrisy, which leads to greater emotional exhaustion and employee turnover. In this line, Thornton and Rupp () observe more deviant behaviors (i.e. stealing) when the overall justice climate appears unfair and external CSR is highly developed.…”
Section: Exchange‐related (Performing) Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, organizations aiming to foster more ethical employee behavior may want to appeal to employees' moral identity-both through their supervisors and beyond. For instance, fostering a general ethical climate in the organization (Ambrose et al 2008;Schminke et al 2005;Victor and Cullen 1988) or supporting coworkers' moral identity (Thornton and Rupp 2015) and peer leadership (Schaubroeck et al 2016) may also represent viable ways to stimulate employees' sense of moral identity.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is a breach in the psychological contract between an employee and the employer, employees are likely to display undesirable outcomes. Consequently, such employees cannot perform successfully in the workplace (Thornton and Rupp, 2016). An employee's perceived contract breach represents an unmet expectation of the benefits promised by their employers.…”
Section: Organizational Justice and Constructive Deviancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological contract breach as a mediator between moral identity and constructive deviance. Group members with a high moral identity consider being moral as central to their sense of self (Thornton and Rupp, 2016). People who care about moral principles may become upset when other people violate them (Folger et al, 2005).…”
Section: Exchange Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%