2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1199(02)00003-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The joint determination of leverage and maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

29
208
4
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
29
208
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect a positive relation between debt maturity and the firm's size. This is also supported in the case of US firms (Barclay and Smith 1995;Stohs and Mauer 1996;Jun and Jen 2003;Barclay et al 2003), British firms (Ozkan 2000) or Spanish firms (Cuñat 1999). …”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We expect a positive relation between debt maturity and the firm's size. This is also supported in the case of US firms (Barclay and Smith 1995;Stohs and Mauer 1996;Jun and Jen 2003;Barclay et al 2003), British firms (Ozkan 2000) or Spanish firms (Cuñat 1999). …”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Assuming that firms with greater growth options usually have more conflicts between shareholders and debt holders, one might expect a positive relationship between growth opportunities and the use of short-term loans. Such a relationship has been confirmed in several studies (Barclay and Smith 1995;Guedes and Opler 1996;Stohs and Mauer 1996;Cuñat 1999;Ozkan 2000;Bevan and Danbolt 2002;Barclay et al 2003). Myers (1977) also argues that a firm can reduce agency problems between shareholders and bondholders if it matches the maturity of its debt to the life of its assets.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(4) En la mayoría de los trabajos las oportunidades de crecimiento se miden a través de la aproximación a la Q de Tobin [Johnson, 1997[Johnson, a y b, 2003Cuñat, 1999;Krishnaswami et al, 1999;Barclay et al, 2003, Chen y Zhao, 2005, entre otros] y no directamente con la Q de Tobin. La ratio valora mercado de los activos de la empresa sobre el valor en libros de los mismos se aproxima notablemente al valor original de la Q. Chung y Pruitt [1994] estiman que al menos el 96,6% de la variabilidad de la Q de Tobin es explicada por el cociente entre el valor de mercado de los activos y el valor contable de los mismos.…”
Section: Artículos Doctrinales Valentín Azofra Palenzuela Paolo Saonunclassified
“…En definitiva se trata de contrastar si la elección del nivel de endeudamiento de las empresas españolas que cotizan en bolsa viene determinado por sus oportunidades de crecimiento, por la configuración de su estructura de propiedad y por las características del entorno institucional que las circunda. A este respecto, nuestro trabajo proporciona evidencia empírica adicional sobre la realidad española [Rodríguez, 1997;Cuñat, 1999;Sogorb y López, 2003, y Andrés et al, 2005 y resultados complementarios a los obtenidos en los trabajos empíricos que relacionan las decisiones de endeudamiento con las oportunidades de crecimiento y estructura de propiedad de las empresas del mundo an-glosajón [Barclay y Smith, 1995Johnson, 1997Johnson, a y b, 2003Bevan y Danbolt, 2000;Cantillo y Wright, 2000, y Barclay et al, 2003.…”
unclassified
“…We use instead a structural game theoretic approach that allows us to explicitly isolate the effect of strategic interactions on the relation between debt capacity and growth option. In a recent paper, Anderson, Sundaresan and Tychon (1996) Barclay, Marx and Smith (2003) [17] empirical analyze the joint determinant of leverage and debt maturity. Aivazian, Ge, Qiu (2005) examine the impact of leverage on firm investment.…”
Section: See Hovakimian Opler and Titman (2001)e9]mentioning
confidence: 99%