2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/582126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Johnson Noise in Biological Matter

Abstract: Can a very low intensity signal overcome a disturbance, the power density of which is much higher than the signal one, and yield some observable effects? The Johnson noise seems to be a disturbance so high as to cause a negative answer to that question, when one studies the effects on the cell level due to the external ELF fields generated by electric power lines (Adair, 1990, 1991). About this subject, we show that the masking effect due to the Johnson noise, known as “Adair’s constraint” and still present in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, a physical mechanism explaining these findings is still absent. The main obstacle in uncovering the physical explanation is the extremely weak amplitude of the magnetic fields used in the experiments, with an energy much lower than the surrounding noise factors and characteristic energy scales, such as the thermal fluctuations of the charged particles and the resulting Johnson-Nyquist noise (known in the literature as the 'kT problem'), the electrical noise (magnetic fields produced by the brain for example are of the same order of the SR field (~ pT) while fields produced by cardiomyocyte excitation is two orders of magnitude higher (~100pT)) and chemical energy required for biological processes (Adair, 1991;Binhi, et al, 2007;Scalia et al, 2012). A detailed description of electric and magnetic field strengths and noise levels can be found in Adair (1991).…”
Section: © 2020 Isbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, a physical mechanism explaining these findings is still absent. The main obstacle in uncovering the physical explanation is the extremely weak amplitude of the magnetic fields used in the experiments, with an energy much lower than the surrounding noise factors and characteristic energy scales, such as the thermal fluctuations of the charged particles and the resulting Johnson-Nyquist noise (known in the literature as the 'kT problem'), the electrical noise (magnetic fields produced by the brain for example are of the same order of the SR field (~ pT) while fields produced by cardiomyocyte excitation is two orders of magnitude higher (~100pT)) and chemical energy required for biological processes (Adair, 1991;Binhi, et al, 2007;Scalia et al, 2012). A detailed description of electric and magnetic field strengths and noise levels can be found in Adair (1991).…”
Section: © 2020 Isbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of these devices, the recording interface is an electrode placed in direct contact with the skin to allow for transduction of biopotentials from the body to the acquisition and processing systems. Achieving a low-impedance interface between the electrode and the skin is vital to transduce signals with high fidelity, as too high of an impedance increases the thermal noise of the electrodes, thus degrading their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. A low SNR may, in turn, prevent clean recording of muscle activation during electromyography (EMG) studies [ 8 ], or may cause morphological changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) signatures that can complicate interpretation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been recently republished in a review [26]; the methods of measurements, models and correlations with human health have been republished in another review that collects a number of papers [27]. Now, in the present project, the analysis of a possibly different behavior, at sea level and at altitude, could be performed recurring to the two already mentioned devices-"Ions meter" and APEC 300-realized in the framework of the researches led by the Section BEM of C.I.R.P.S.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%