2011
DOI: 10.4138/atlgeol.2011.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Joggins Fossil Cliffs UNESCO World Heritage site: a review of recent research

Abstract: The Joggins Fossil Cliffs UNESCO World Heritage Site is a Carboniferous coastal section along the shores of the Cumberland Basin, an extension of Chignecto Bay, itself an arm of the Bay of Fundy, with excellent preservation of biota preserved in their environmental context. The Cliffs provide insight into the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) world, the most important interval in Earth's past for the formation of coal. The site has had a long history of scientific research and, while there have been well over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two unnamed possible crown caecilians are an unnamed form from the Wadi Milk Formation of Sudan (Cenomanian) and a terminal Cretaceous fossil from the Pajcha Pata in Bolivia. These provide hints that older caecilians, whose fossils appear to be so immensely rare, might be found down to the base of the Cretaceous at least, dated as 145.0 Ma ± 0.8 Myr (Gradstein et al, 2012, p. 838) (Carroll, 1964), and it falls within Eureptilia, on the stem to Diapsida (Laurin and Reisz, 1995;deBraga and Rieppel, 1997) -Lang et al, 2006;Grey and Fink, 2010;Utting et al, 2010) confirm that the Joggins Formation falls entirely within the Langsettian European time unit, equivalent to the Westphalian A, and roughly matching the Russian Cheremshanian, in the later part of the Bashkirian Stage. Earlier dates for these units were equivocal (Menning et al, 2000), but the Langsettian is given as 319-318 Ma by Gradstein et al (2012, p. 605), rather older than the 314.5-313.4 Ma ± 1.1 Myr given in GTS2004 (Davydov et al, 2004).…”
Section: Crown Gymnophiona (Caecilians) (46)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two unnamed possible crown caecilians are an unnamed form from the Wadi Milk Formation of Sudan (Cenomanian) and a terminal Cretaceous fossil from the Pajcha Pata in Bolivia. These provide hints that older caecilians, whose fossils appear to be so immensely rare, might be found down to the base of the Cretaceous at least, dated as 145.0 Ma ± 0.8 Myr (Gradstein et al, 2012, p. 838) (Carroll, 1964), and it falls within Eureptilia, on the stem to Diapsida (Laurin and Reisz, 1995;deBraga and Rieppel, 1997) -Lang et al, 2006;Grey and Fink, 2010;Utting et al, 2010) confirm that the Joggins Formation falls entirely within the Langsettian European time unit, equivalent to the Westphalian A, and roughly matching the Russian Cheremshanian, in the later part of the Bashkirian Stage. Earlier dates for these units were equivocal (Menning et al, 2000), but the Langsettian is given as 319-318 Ma by Gradstein et al (2012, p. 605), rather older than the 314.5-313.4 Ma ± 1.1 Myr given in GTS2004 (Davydov et al, 2004).…”
Section: Crown Gymnophiona (Caecilians) (46)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cumberland and Mabou groups form a continuous and conformable 14.7 km long outcrop ( Fig. 5) along the coast of Chignecto Bay (Grey and Finkel 2011). Browne and Plint (1994) mention that the margins of the sub-basin include the North Fault to the south, the Caledonia-Dorchester fault system to the north, and the Harvey-Hopewell Fault to the west.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sandbody is also a geobody, with the internal structures being the architectural elements (Choi et al 2011). The Joggins Formation coal beds have been the subject of studies pertaining to their deposition, composition, and hydrocarbon potential, with the findings summarized by Grey and Finkel (2011). Dawson (1854) estimated that the formation contained a mini-mum of 45 coal beds with varying thicknesses from less than a centimetre to metre scale.…”
Section: Sedimentology and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rygel and Shipley 2005). Although the coal-bearing strata of the underlying Joggins Formation was the subject of numerous studies in the following decades (Grey and Finkel 2011), the Springhill Mines Formation was largely ignored. Way (1968) studied a ~250 m interval (at 175-425 m in our section) and determined that the strata represent the channel, floodplain, levee, and backswamp deposits of a meandering fluvial system.…”
Section: Distribution and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from recent work on the underlying Little River and Joggins formations Davies et al 2005), much of the 4.5 km thickness of the Joggins section has not been described in detail since the pioneering work of William Logan (Rygel and Shipley, 2005). The lack of a basic sedimentological context for much of the section is a deficiency that prevents a fuller understanding of this iconic Pennsylvanian locality (Grey and Finkel 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%