The jibarization of logos: how medical reductionism can kill

Sala, Juan Emilio

doi:10.1016/j.bmhime.2017.11.021

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No obstante, de la definición de Menéndez se desprende que el MMH es jerárquico, asimétrico, clasista, racista y mercantil. Además, Sala advierte que el reduccionismo médico derivado de la excesiva división disciplinar y fragmentación del conocimiento constituye un verdadero problema para la salud pública, propiciando actitudes potencialmente peligrosas para los diversos integrantes de los sistemas de salud 16 .…”

Section: Modelo Médico Hegemónicounclassified

Educación médica y diversidad cultural en Chile. Un diálogo pendiente

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educación médica y diversidad cultural en Chile. Un diálogo pendiente liliana e. ortiz-moreira, eDUarDo a. Fasce-henry, olga B. matUs-BetancoUrt a , ivone camPos c. b Medical education and cultural diversity in Chile. A pending dialogue Medical education in Chile has a good research productivity. National educators are skilled in complex curricular design processes and in didactic innovation. However, the question of what it means to be doctor in a society that moves towards interculturality, has not been addressed thoroughly. Using the structure of a clinical record, we outline our critical view about the relationship between medical education and diversity. To describe the medical history, we refer to some variables of the training process such as the Hegemonic Model of Medicine, the epistemological beliefs of the students, the hidden curriculum and the educational environment. Then, the empirical evidence of the clinical picture, diagnosis and internationally recommended treatment is described, to end with a local therapeutic proposal.

show abstract

Section: Modelo Médico Hegemónicounclassified

Educación médica y diversidad cultural en Chile. Un diálogo pendiente

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cartesian paradigm (normal and/or Mode 1* science) SES paradigm (post-normal and/or Mode 2* science)Selected referencesMono-and multi-disciplinary Inter-and trans-disciplinarySpangenberg (2011),Brand and Vadrot (2013);Mauser et al (2013);Görg et al (2014);Spangenberg et al (2015) Ontological monism Ontological pluralismEscobar (2010Escobar ( , 2014;Lombardi and Pérez Ransanz (2011);Spangenberg et al (2015);Sala (2017) Epistemological monism Epistemological pluralismNorton (2003);Miller et al (2008); Escobar (2010);Spangenberg et al (2015) Centered in equilibrium ideas (static)Centered in change ideas (dynamic) Norton (2003); Berkes et al (2003); Mace (2014) Trend to generalization and universalization of results (globalized science) Emphasis on local impact of results (place-based science) Potschin and Haines-Young (2013); Stewart et al (2013); Oteros-Rozas et al (2015); Balvanera et al (2017); Díaz et al (2018) Favors accumulation processes Favors re-distributive processes Berkes et al (2003); Bailey (2006); Carolan (2006); Tallis and Lubchenco (2014); Pouw and Gupta (2017); Zafra-Calvo et al(2017)Reductionism and Cartesian analysis Holism, emergentism and dialecticFuntowicz and Ravetz (1993);Bergandi and Blandin (1998); Looijen(2000);Carolan (2005);Clark and York (2005) Highly specializedLateral and complex thoughtMorin (1996); Scheffer (2014); Scheffer et al(2015); Sala(2017)Driven by curiosity and resolution of academic problems Critical research, driven by society's problems and concrete demandsFuntowicz and Ravetz (1993)<...>…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving towards public policy-ready science: philosophical insights on the social-ecological systems perspective for conservation science

Sala

Torchio

2019

Ecosystems and People

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social-ecological systems (SES) perspective stems from the need to rethink the ways humans relate to the environment, given the evidence that conventional conservation and management approaches are often ineffective in dealing with complex socio-environmental problems. The SES approach conceives non-scientific and scientific knowledge as equally necessary in the process of management and public policy formation. Thus, the adoption of the SES approach must also serve to make better decisions about what kind of science and technology would be 'public policy-ready' (as well as also 'policy-relevant'); that is, a science oriented and conceived to provide concrete solutions to societal needs and demands. Here we review and reinterpret the SES perspective as a real paradigm change for conservation science. Under the lenses of philosophy, we try to untangle some weak points of the SES approach in order to advance to a conservation science closer to the process of science-based public policy creation and to enhance the intertwining with other types of knowledge. In this sense, we discuss how co-production of knowledge and decision-making process under the SES perspective are a huge step forward towards fulfilling the need to bring increasingly closer the spheres of science and policy, narrowing its interface.

show abstract

The jibarization of logos: how medical reductionism can kill

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Educación médica y diversidad cultural en Chile. Un diálogo pendiente

Educación médica y diversidad cultural en Chile. Un diálogo pendiente

Moving towards public policy-ready science: philosophical insights on the social-ecological systems perspective for conservation science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About