Using functional traits to explain species' range limits is a promising approach in functional biogeography. It replaces the idiosyncrasy of species-specific climate ranges with a generic trait-based predictive framework. In addition, it has the potential to shed light on specific filter mechanisms creating large-scale vegetation patterns. However, its application to a continental flora, spanning large climate gradients, has been hampered by a lack of trait data. Here, we explore whether five key plant functional traits (seed mass, wood density, specific leaf area (SLA), maximum height, and longevity of a tree)-indicative of life history, mechanical, and physiological adaptations-explain the climate ranges of 250 North American tree species distributed from the boreal to the subtropics. Although the relationship between traits and the median climate across a species range is weak, quantile regressions revealed strong effects on range limits. Wood density and seed mass were strongly related to the lower but not upper temperature range limits of species. Maximum height affects the species range limits in both dry and humid climates, whereas SLA and longevity do not show clear relationships. These results allow the definition and delineation of climatic "no-go areas" for North American tree species based on key traits. As some of these key traits serve as important parameters in recent vegetation models, the implementation of trait-based climatic constraints has the potential to predict both range shifts and ecosystem consequences on a more functional basis. Moreover, for future trait-based vegetation models our results provide a benchmark for model evaluation.climate niche | plant geography | bioclimatic envelope I n 1895 the Danish plant ecologist Eugen Warming defined for the first time the objectives of a functional plant biogeography, when he expressed the need "to investigate the problems concerning the economy of plants, the demands that they make on their environment, and the means that they use to use the surrounding conditions. . .." He already envisioned how to tackle this: "This subject leads us into deep morphological, anatomical, and physiological investigations; [. . .] it is very difficult, yet very alluring; but only in few cases can its problems be satisfactorily solved at the present time" (1).Since Warming's days plant science has progressed beyond the study of just a "few cases." For more than a century now, botanists and plant ecologists have collected data on morphological, anatomical, and physiological traits (2, 3), and have mapped the distributions of tens of thousands of plant species (e.g., Global Biodiversity Information Facility, www.gbif.org). In addition, climatologists and soil scientists have provided us with highresolution global maps of the plant's surrounding condition. With this it has now become feasible to analyze the functional underpinnings of plant distributions for entire regional floras across large-scale environmental gradients (4). It is well established that on regio...