2010
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200900169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Japanese toxicogenomics project: Application of toxicogenomics

Abstract: Biotechnology advances have provided novel methods for the risk assessment of chemicals. The application of microarray technologies to toxicology, known as toxicogenomics, is becoming an accepted approach for identifying chemicals with potential safety problems. Gene expression profiling is expected to identify the mechanisms that underlie the potential toxicity of chemicals. This technology has also been applied to identify biomarkers of toxicity to predict potential hazardous chemicals. Ultimately, toxicogen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
169
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a total of three tests an average IC 10 value of 18 mM was calculated. The subcytotoxic concentration of APAP used in hHEP was 5 mM, which corresponds to the value previously described [42]. PCA of the microarray data shows highly reproducible results for the in vitro samples (Fig.…”
Section: Predictive Capacity Of Hskp-hpc For Apap-induced Hepatotoxicitysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a total of three tests an average IC 10 value of 18 mM was calculated. The subcytotoxic concentration of APAP used in hHEP was 5 mM, which corresponds to the value previously described [42]. PCA of the microarray data shows highly reproducible results for the in vitro samples (Fig.…”
Section: Predictive Capacity Of Hskp-hpc For Apap-induced Hepatotoxicitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Microarray data of human hepatocyte cultures (hHEP) established from human cryopreserved hepatocytes were obtained from the toxicology database TG-GATEs. The latter being established by a 5-year collaboration between the National Institute of Health Sciences and 17 pharmaceutical companies in Japan [41,42]. Only data from cells exposed for 24 h to 5 mM APAP and the respective vehicle controls was used for comparative gene expression analysis with self obtained data.…”
Section: Microarray Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] Terms in grey have a significance, after multiple testing correction, below adjP < 0.05 (Supporting Information SI Table 6). B) The gene dao (D-amino-acid oxidase) is associated with a number of the gold compounds according to the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD), sorted by frequency of chemical-gene associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] Recently this situation has been addressed by the release of two such datasets: the TGP (TG-GATEs) dataset [37] and the DrugMatrix. [38] Both have a uniform experimental design, assess a large number of marketed drugs alongside standard toxicological model compounds (such as acetaminophen) and provide in vitro as well as in vivo data for comparative analysis.…”
Section: Public Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced sets of toxicity associated genes can be assayed at higher throughput or lower cost, for example with Luminex â technology [36,37]. Microarrays, such as Affymetrix GeneChips â , form currently the basis for most of the existing gene profiling data, including the 'Japanese Toxicogenomics Project-Genomics Assisted Toxicity Evaluation system' (TG-GATEs) reference database [15,25,38]. Pathway activation can be studied using open source tools or commercial tools, such as the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity â Systems, www.ingenuity.com) or the freely available InCroMap tool [39,40].…”
Section: From Hts Of Many Agents To Genomic Profiling Analysis Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%