2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.01798
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IXPE view of GRB 221009A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Right: evolution of peak flux and peak frequency from broken power-law fits to the radio SED at 50 GHz (Table 7). GRB 221009A is one of the brightest GRBs ever observed (Kennea et al 2022a;Veres et al 2022;Ursi et al 2022;Frederiks et al 2022;Iwakiri et al 2022;Kobayashi et al 2022;Negro et al 2023). While this is due in part to its proximity, GRB 221009A is also intrinsically among the most luminous known bursts at these wavelengths (Figure 7).…”
Section: Comparison To Other γ-Ray Burstsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Right: evolution of peak flux and peak frequency from broken power-law fits to the radio SED at 50 GHz (Table 7). GRB 221009A is one of the brightest GRBs ever observed (Kennea et al 2022a;Veres et al 2022;Ursi et al 2022;Frederiks et al 2022;Iwakiri et al 2022;Kobayashi et al 2022;Negro et al 2023). While this is due in part to its proximity, GRB 221009A is also intrinsically among the most luminous known bursts at these wavelengths (Figure 7).…”
Section: Comparison To Other γ-Ray Burstsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other key observations include the first observations of the prompt and afterglow polarization from the same burst (Negro et al 2023), the (somewhat) surprising (Murase et al 2022) lack of neutrinos (Abbasi et al 2023), and the first disruptive target of opportunity from an out-of-cycle proposal of JWST (Levan et al 2023; also the first JWST observation of a GRB afterglow ever).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the GRB 221009A dust-scattering rings were also reported by Vasilopoulos et al (2023) and Williams et al (2023), who used Swift/XRT, and by Negro et al (2023), who used IXPE data. Swift/XRT could already image the X-ray rings about 1 day after the GRB, making possible the discovery of dust clouds at distances smaller than 300 pc (Vasilopoulos et al 2023), which formed X-ray rings that were already outside the EPIC field of view during XMM-Newton observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A 1-10 keV fluence of (1.6-6.1) × 10 −4 erg cm −2 was instead estimated from the analysis of the dust rings observed with IXPE, which allowed Negro et al (2023) to derive limits on the X-ray polarization of GRB 221009A. During the IXPE observations, the rings produced by dust closer than 2 kpc were outside the field of view, and due to the limited angular resolution and collecting area, only two rings corresponding to broad dust distributions centered at 3.75 and 14.41 kpc could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation