2007
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ITS2 Database II: homology modelling RNA structure for molecular systematics

Abstract: An increasing number of phylogenetic analyses are based on the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). They mainly use the fast evolving sequence for low-level analyses. When considering the highly conserved structure, the same marker could also be used for higher level phylogenies. Furthermore, structural features of the ITS2 allow distinguishing different species from each other. Despite its importance, the correct structure is only rarely found by standard RNA folding algorithms. To overcome this hindrance fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
117
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…and Haematococcus pluvialis (SAG 34-1h) were directly folded with the help of the RNAstructure program (Mathews et al, 2004) and subsequently manually corrected. The predicted ITS2 secondary structure of Haematococcus droebakensis was obtained from the ITS2 database Selig et al, 2008;Koetschan et al, 2010Koetschan et al, , 2012, whereas the secondary structures of Stephanosphaera pluvialis and the additional 42 strains of Haematococcus (Table S2) were predicted by homology modelling , using either Stephanosphaera sp. (for S. pluvialis) or Haematococcus pluvialis SAG 34-1h (for the Haematococcus) strains as a template.…”
Section: Sequence Analysis and Its2 Secondary Structure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Haematococcus pluvialis (SAG 34-1h) were directly folded with the help of the RNAstructure program (Mathews et al, 2004) and subsequently manually corrected. The predicted ITS2 secondary structure of Haematococcus droebakensis was obtained from the ITS2 database Selig et al, 2008;Koetschan et al, 2010Koetschan et al, , 2012, whereas the secondary structures of Stephanosphaera pluvialis and the additional 42 strains of Haematococcus (Table S2) were predicted by homology modelling , using either Stephanosphaera sp. (for S. pluvialis) or Haematococcus pluvialis SAG 34-1h (for the Haematococcus) strains as a template.…”
Section: Sequence Analysis and Its2 Secondary Structure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the suboptimal structures followed the common core of eukaryotic ITS2 secondary structures (Schultz et al 2005) and was used as a template for homology modelling. Homology modelling (Wolf et al 2005b) of all secondary structures from sequences of AG strains used in further analyses was done using the ITS2 PAM 50 matrix with the custom modelling option (Selig et al 2008) available at the ITS2 Database (Schultz et al 2005;Wolf et al 2005a;Selig et al 2008). Secondary structures were displayed with 4SALE (Seibel et al 2008).…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Secondary Structure Analyses Of Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With ITS sequences, there are also additional reasons because structural features of ITS1 and ITS2 may be important for positioning the transcriptprocessing machinery on the pre-rRNA, the precursor of the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNAs (Côté and Peculis 2001;Abeyrathne and Nazar 2005). Hence, the secondary structures of ITS RNA sequences provide additional evolutionary information (Coleman 2000;2003;Coleman and Vacquier 2002;Wolf et al 2005a) and a rather simple molecular marker, which may be particularly useful when studying closely related species (Müller et al 2007;Selig et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ITS2 secondary structure is typically a four-helix model, which is common to almost all eukaryotic taxa (Coleman, 2003;Schultz et al, 2005) and is true for digenean trematodes as well (Morgan & Blair, 1998). The conserved nature of ITS2 secondary structural core allows utility in inferring phylogenies at higher taxonomic levels, in addition to its role for low-level phylogenetic analyses on the species and genus levels Selig et al, 2008). The identical nature of the ITS2 secondary structure can be attributed to similarity in rRNA biogenesis among eukaryotes; its folding pattern plays an important role in processing of mature rRNA (Joseph et al, 1999) and structures are maintained during evolution through transitions/transversions, although mutations occur frequently (Coleman, 2007;Keller et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%