2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Italian version of the mobile phone problematic use scale for adults (MPPUS): A validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSU is typically assessed with various scales, including the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS; Bianchi & Phillips, 2005 ), the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Questionnaire (PMPUQ; Billieux, der Linden, & Rochat, 2008 ), the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS; Kwon, Lee, et al., 2013 ), the Short Version of Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV; Kwon, Kim, Cho, & Yang, 2013 ), the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI; Lin et al., 2014 ) and the Short-Form of Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI-SF; Lin, Pan, Lin, & Chen, 2017 ), which measure factors like tolerance, withdrawal, overuse, loss of control and dangerous/prohibited use. While cross-cultural validation studies have shown satisfactory psychometric properties for these scales (e.g., Agus, Mascia, Bonfiglio, & Penna, 2022 ; Andrade et al., 2022 ; Khoury et al., 2017 ; Lopez-Fernandez, Honrubia-Serrano, Freixa-Blanxart, & Gibson, 2014 , 2018 ; Sfendla et al., 2018 ; Wang, Long, Liu, Liu, & Billieux, 2020 ; Zhao, Rafik-Galea, Fitriana, & Song, 2022 ), we would argue that there is room for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…PSU is typically assessed with various scales, including the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS; Bianchi & Phillips, 2005 ), the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Questionnaire (PMPUQ; Billieux, der Linden, & Rochat, 2008 ), the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS; Kwon, Lee, et al., 2013 ), the Short Version of Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV; Kwon, Kim, Cho, & Yang, 2013 ), the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI; Lin et al., 2014 ) and the Short-Form of Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI-SF; Lin, Pan, Lin, & Chen, 2017 ), which measure factors like tolerance, withdrawal, overuse, loss of control and dangerous/prohibited use. While cross-cultural validation studies have shown satisfactory psychometric properties for these scales (e.g., Agus, Mascia, Bonfiglio, & Penna, 2022 ; Andrade et al., 2022 ; Khoury et al., 2017 ; Lopez-Fernandez, Honrubia-Serrano, Freixa-Blanxart, & Gibson, 2014 , 2018 ; Sfendla et al., 2018 ; Wang, Long, Liu, Liu, & Billieux, 2020 ; Zhao, Rafik-Galea, Fitriana, & Song, 2022 ), we would argue that there is room for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The problematic use of smartphones was evaluated by the administration of the Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale (MPPUS) [8] in its Italian version [9]. This instrument (characterised by 24 items, assessed on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5) evaluated the following dimensions: Withdrawal and social aspects, Craving and escape from other problems and the General dimension of problematic use of smartphone.…”
Section: Mppusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, while Bianchi and Phillips [8,9] found that extroversion and low self-esteem appear to be precursors to problematic smartphone use, many factors can contribute. For example, Busch and McCarthy's review [10] of 239 studies identified macro areas that can be considered antecedents of this phenomenon, such as control (understood as the ability to control impulses and self-regulate the use of the smartphone), health (both physical and mental), factors linked to the family context and the technological characteristics of the object itself.…”
Section: Introduction 1smartphone Use and Overusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, we can find many validations of this scale around the world. The Italian version of the scale [52] is composed of 24 items divided in two subscales covering the issues of tolerance, escape from other problems and craving and withdrawal and negative life consequence in the areas of social, familial, work and financial difficulties. All items are measured on a scale ranging from "not true at all" (1) to "extremely true" (5).…”
Section: Mppusmentioning
confidence: 99%