The Issues Deserve More Credit

Abstract

This paper explores the `issue-oriented' perspective on public involvement in politics opened up by recent research in Science and Technology Studies (STS). This research proposes that public controversy around techno-scientific issues is dedicated to the articulation of these issues and their eventual accommodation in society. It does not, however, fully answer the question of why issue formation should be appreciated as a crucial dimension of democratic politics. To address this question, I turn to the work of two early 20th-century American pragmatists: John Dewey and Walter Lippmann. In their work on democracy in industrial society, they conceived of public involvement in politics as being occasioned by, and providing a way to settle, controversies that existing institutions were unable to resolve. Moreover, Dewey developed a `socio-ontological' understanding of issues, which suggests that people's involvement in politics is mediated by problems that affect them. Dewey and Lippmann thus provide important argumentative resources for further elaborating the approach to public involvement developed in STS. STS research has also developed a `socio-ontological' approach, as it focuses on the `attachments' that people mobilize (and that mobilize people) in the performance of their concern with public affairs. Such an approach provides an alternative to discursivist analysis of the role of `issue framing' in the involvement of publics in politics.

Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms

“…While the term 'public' or 'the public' is often used to describe the general population, well established research in public understanding of science and public engagement reminds us that the public cannot be assumed to be a monolithic entity (Chilvers and Kearnes 2015;Marres 2007).…”

Energy Democracies and Publics in the Making: A Relational Agenda for Research and Practice

“…Contributions from relational STS have described the mutual construction of particular kinds of energy publics and issues/objects of interest. For example, Noortje Marres work has demonstrated the important role played by material technologies in the smart home (Marres, 2012) and understandings of particular policy issues (Marres, 2007) in mediating and transforming energy publics. Similarly, Barry's (2013) work on the Baku-TbilisiCeyhan pipeline illustrates how different kinds of publics emerge at different times and places alongside different manifestations of policy issues and the "political situation.…”

Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance

“…The basis for inclusion is not that people have contextual knowledge or possess a specialised competence that can complement (or question) science, but that the public always can contribute knowledge about public concerns (Jasanoff 2003, Wynne 2003, Marres 2007). The general public should be involved not in order to evaluate and complement scientific claims in a restricted sense, but to broaden the issue by asking questions about the underlying causes of an environmental problem as well as its broader social consequences (including the consequences of proposed solutions) (Jasanoff 2005, Wynne 2005).…”