1987
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1987-0879582-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The isometry groups of manifolds and the automorphism groups of domains

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We prove that every compact Lie group can be realized as the (full) automorphism group of a strictly pseudoconvex domain and as the (full) isometry group of a compact, connected, smooth Riemannian manifold.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that any compact real Lie group can be realized as an automorphism group of a strictly pseudoconvex domain [15,134]. 7.2.…”
Section: Automorphism Groups and Proper Self-mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that any compact real Lie group can be realized as an automorphism group of a strictly pseudoconvex domain [15,134]. 7.2.…”
Section: Automorphism Groups and Proper Self-mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the work of Bedford-Dadok [2] and Saerens-Zame [13], it is known that every compact Lie group can be realized as the automorphism group of a strictly pseudoconvex bounded domain with real analytic boundary in C N . On the other hand, from the work of B. Wong [15], a C ∞ strongly pseudoconvex domain with a noncompact automorphism group is necessarily biholomorphic to the unit ball.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it makes sense to say that most strictly pseudoconvex bounded domains possess compact automorphism group. Indeed, it has been proved, by Bedford-Dadok [1] and Saerens-Zame [14] in 1987, that any compact Lie group can be realized as the automorphism group of a strictly pseudoconvex domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally both [1] and [14] and the methods therein should be relevant to our work, whereas the two papers are quite different in their methods. In this article we choose to follow the circle of ideas in [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation