Some 10 years ago Hazebroek and Oosterhoff (1951) thoroughly analysed the complex geometrical forms which the cyclohexane ring can assume, the mechanical rigidity of the chair form and the contrasting flexibility of the boat form. One single variable suffices to define completely the geometry of the flexible form ; this variable may be any one dihedral angle between three successive carbon-carbon bonds, any one 1-4 carbon-carbon distance, or, as in Hazebroek and Oosterhoff's case, a mathematical variable selected to suit their purpose of describing in a symmetrical way the rotation between staggered and eclipsed conformations. Perhaps because of its formal nature, this important paper has been frequently overlooked, but with the growing interest in the family of cyclohexane conformations which include the boat and the symmetrical skew as extreme cases, it seems important to present material implicit in Hazebroek and Oosterhoff's paper (though reached differently here) with numerical emphasis on angles and coordinates. Further relevant material is presented in papers by Brodetsky (1929) and Henriquez (1934).
ProcedureUsing Figure 1, consider two carbon-carbon bonds placed in the zy-plane, with the central atom A at the origin, and with P and B symmetrically disposed about the vertical xy-plane. Atom C is initially placed in the xy-plane, but is free to rotate appropriately about AB produced, and its location is conveniently given by the dihedral angle R between the planes PAB and ABC. The carboncarbon distance is our unit length. Another atom E is introduced, with x positive, but necessarily placed so that A, E, and C are at the corners of an equilateral triangle of side length 1 a6330 if tetrahedral geometry and equal bond lengths are to be preserved. The position of this fifth atom is completely determined by the original location of atom C. By trial and error methods we have determined the coordinates of E for all possible positions of 0, and computed the dihedral angle 8 between the planes EPA and PAB. Purthermore, the original choice for C, and its implied position of E, defines the position of D (at the corners of the equilateral triangle PBD, side 1 a6330 ; unit distance from both E and C, and having an x coordinate 0 -0000) and fixes the third dihedral angle T between the planes ABC and BCD, There are three further dihedral angles about the bonds CD, DE, and EF, but these are identical with the set fl, R, T already discussed.