2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-008-9058-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The isokinetic effect as related to the activation energy for the gases diffusion in coal at ambient temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative DS = values for the dehydration process of the hydrate precursor indicate the higher orderliness of the activated state than the initial state. The results can be interpreted as a slow stage[44,49,50]. The positive values of DH = agree with the endothermic peak in the DTA upon dehydration reaction step.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative DS = values for the dehydration process of the hydrate precursor indicate the higher orderliness of the activated state than the initial state. The results can be interpreted as a slow stage[44,49,50]. The positive values of DH = agree with the endothermic peak in the DTA upon dehydration reaction step.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…T i relates to the activation energy and pre-exponential factor [50][51][52]. According to the FTIR spectra, six vibrational band positions of water of crystallization (3440.…”
Section: Determination Of Iso-kinetic Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of their investigation, the diffusion rate in micropores had the highest rate for carbon dioxide rather than nitrogen and methane due to the small kinetic diameter of carbon dioxide (0.33 nm) than methane (0.38 nm) and nitrogen (0.36 nm). Moreover, they proposed that regarding the swelling of coal matrixes, which was a cause of gas adsorption, apparent diffusivity was decreased with the pressure increase. ,, Mianowski and Marecka (2008) reported that unipore diffusion model was not a good candidate model in the whole time of adsorption processes for methane and carbon dioxide. They concluded that the modified diffusion model, which will be described in the next section, would be a good fitting with experimental data …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they proposed that regarding the swelling of coal matrixes, which was a cause of gas adsorption, apparent diffusivity was decreased with the pressure increase. ,, Mianowski and Marecka (2008) reported that unipore diffusion model was not a good candidate model in the whole time of adsorption processes for methane and carbon dioxide. They concluded that the modified diffusion model, which will be described in the next section, would be a good fitting with experimental data …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have realised the importance of gas adsorption kinetics in coal and shale (Bhowmik and Dutta, 2013;Gasparik et al, 2014;Mianowski and Marecka, 2009). Methane adsorption rate data has been analysed for shale samples, showing a negative relation between the adsorption rate and pressure (Dang et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%