2006
DOI: 10.1086/500309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Irradiation Origin of Beryllium Radioisotopes and Other Short‐lived Radionuclides

Abstract: Two explanations exist for the short-lived radionuclides (T 1/2 5 Myr) present in the solar system when the calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) first formed. They originated either from the ejecta of a supernova or by the in situ irradiation of nebular dust by energetic particles. With a half-life of only 53 days, 7 Be is then the key discriminant, since it can be made only by irradiation. Using the same irradiation model developed earlier by our group, we calculate the yield of 7 Be. Within model uncertai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
151
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
151
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the duration of irradiation of individual solid targets or the duration of SLR condensation from an irradiated gas, , is much shorter than the SLR halfind T irr lives. The x-wind model is in agreement with this assumption for most SLRs since solids are constantly transported close to the star, irradiated over a short timescale, yr ind T p 1-100 irr depending on their size (Gounelle et al 2001), before being ejected at large distances on the accretion disk. However, as noted by Leya et al (2003) and Gounelle et al (2006) final production).…”
Section: Maximum Production Yieldssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the duration of irradiation of individual solid targets or the duration of SLR condensation from an irradiated gas, , is much shorter than the SLR halfind T irr lives. The x-wind model is in agreement with this assumption for most SLRs since solids are constantly transported close to the star, irradiated over a short timescale, yr ind T p 1-100 irr depending on their size (Gounelle et al 2001), before being ejected at large distances on the accretion disk. However, as noted by Leya et al (2003) and Gounelle et al (2006) final production).…”
Section: Maximum Production Yieldssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Different scenarios have been proposed to explain the abundance of the SLRs in the ESS but a global astrophysical interpretation accounting for all of them is still lacking (see Wasserburg et al 2006 for a recent review). The possibility of producing SLRs by in situ irradiation has been extensively discussed and challenged in the last decade (Lee et al 1998;Gounelle et al 2001Gounelle et al , 2006Goswami et al 2001;Leya et al 2003), but all these studies addressed, above all, the issue of producing the canonical abundance ratios locally within a given target. Yet, a crucial issue is the total amount of nuclei that can be synthesized within such a process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One likely explanation for these abundance anomalies are spallation reactions of SPs with the dust in the protosolar nebula (e.g. Lee et al 1998b;McKeegan et al 2000;Gounelle et al 2001Gounelle et al , 2006. However, this would require a strongly enhanced SP flux of the young Sun by a factor 3 × 10 5 compared to the contemporary Sun (McKeegan et al 2000), consistent with the estimated SP flux of T Tauri stars derived by Feigelson et al (2002).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…41 Ca, with a half life of only 0.1 Myr, or 10 Be, with a half life of 1.5 Myr), which therefore cannot be originating in SN nucleosynthesis but must instead be originating in situ (as discussed in detail by e.g. Gounelle et al 2006). While the observed isotopic anomalies likely require proton (rather than electron) bombardment, our observations provide evidence of in situ acceleration mechanisms closely associated with neutral material from the star's circumstellar disk, that is, an environment where accelerated nonthermal particles interact with the protoplanetary material from which the meteorites will later grow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%