The IPv6 QoS system implementation in virtual infrastructure

Tarasiuk, Halina; Hanczewski, Sławomir; Kaliszan, Adam; Szuman, Robert; Ogrodowczyk, Łukasz; Olszewski, Iwo; Giertych, Michał; Wiśniewski, P.

doi:10.1007/s11235-015-9996-6

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…EIGRPv6's default metrics for determining the optimum path are "bandwidth and latency," but dependability, load, and MTU can also be employed [28]. It transmits "welcome mails" to its neighbours every five seconds on FDDI networks and Ethernet, and every minute on SMDS links and Frame Relay [29]. It is 90 kilometres away, administratively.…”

Section: Eigrpv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 Network

Essah

Anand

2021

AJRCoS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A collection of interconnected devices that deal with communication protocols that are common to share resources provided by nodes of a network over digital interconnections is a computer network. The process of determining the most efficient route from a source to a given target is called routing. Cisco's Enriched Internal Routing Gateway Protocol for IPv6 and the IETF's OSPFv3 (First Version 3 of Open Shortest Path) are two of the most frequently studied IPv6 routing protocols among researchers (EIGRPv6). As a result of the popularity of EIGRPv6 and OSPFv3, it is necessary to undertake a thorough contrast of the two protocols once working inside a minor enterprise network on IPv6. Thus, the study analysed the performance comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 networks with regards to convergence time, end-to-end delay, and packet loss. Packet Tracer 6.2.2 was used to compare the performance of routing protocols of different kinds. In the simulation, Cisco routers, switches, and generic computers were employed in the test. In these topologies, standard IPv6 addresses have been used. The findings of the study revealed that EIGRPv6 outperforms OSPFv3. As a result, we advocate using EIGRPv6 as an internal routing protocol in a network of IPv6.

show abstract

Section: Eigrpv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 Network

Essah

Anand

2021

AJRCoS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thanks to the FL field in the IPv6 header, the data stream can be classified by labeled. This case reveals the effect of IPv6 on QoS [29,30]. Several approaches are proposed in the literature [14][15][16][17], despite the use of the FL field is not fully defined.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A priority-based queuing model approach using destination parameters forreal-time applications on IPv6 networks

Demir¹,

Özçeli̇k²

2020

Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the early days of the Internet architecture, the most important aim is to transmit data over packet switched networks. The traditional Internet architecture used in these networks lacks quality of service. However, today, as realtime applications increase, it is needed. There are approaches to improving the quality of service using the flow label field in the Internet Protocol version 6 header. In this study, a novel algorithm that uses destination network parameters to reduce queuing and end-to-end delay is created. A round-robin-based time-aware priority queue new model is used within this algorithm. Data packets using this proposed queue are prioritized with metric values of the destination network. In order to provide end-to-end service quality, the prioritization value is used by placing it in the flow label field. For this purpose, a new approach to the use of this field is proposed. Delay, one of the most important factors affecting quality of service, is reduced with the proposed algorithm and flow label usage approach. As a result, the reduction in delay times between 22 and 39 ms resulted in various improvement rates between 16.79% and 35.13%.

show abstract

“…By default, "bandwidth and delay" are the metrics of EIGRPv6 to determine the best path, however, reliability, load and MTU may also be used as metrics. It sends "hello messages" to its neighbors after every 5 seconds on the links (Ethernet and FDDI) and after 60 seconds on the links (Frame Relay and SMDS) [21]. Its administrative distance is 90.…”

Section: A Eigrpv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Open [21]. It divides the network into areas to group similar routers together for better management.…”

Section: B Ospfv3mentioning

confidence: 99%