2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ipswich Microbreak Technique to alleviate neck and shoulder discomfort during microscopic procedures

Abstract: Neck and shoulder disorders are a considerable health problem amongst frequent microscope users. We aimed to investigate the neck and shoulder discomfort experienced during prolonged microscopic activity and to assess the benefits of minibreaks. A prospective crossover study was performed on 17 healthy volunteers sitting still while looking down a bench with and without the Ipswich Microbreak Technique (IMT). We used a subjective measure of time to fatigue and pain in the neck and shoulder regions as well as o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence suggests that the breaking of static postures can decrease the onset of pain and intensity of muscular contractions, suggesting that a key preventative strategy may be avoiding a posture for an extended period of time [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence suggests that the breaking of static postures can decrease the onset of pain and intensity of muscular contractions, suggesting that a key preventative strategy may be avoiding a posture for an extended period of time [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies also reported a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in these regions of the body. Accordingly, microscope users,[ 31 ] ready-made garment workers,[ 17 ] sonographers,[ 32 ] control room operators,[ 1 ] surgeons,[ 3 ] nurses[ 33 ] and truck drivers[ 34 ] had a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in the upper extremity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Short-break condition, rest periods of 30 seconds were provided after every 5 minutes of work, with this pattern completed a total of eight times (Figure 3B). The noted rest duration was chosen since 20-30 seconds is a common duration that has been used in previous studies (Dorion & Darveau, 2013;Genaidy et al, 1995;Henning et al, 1989;McLean et al, 2001;Vijendren et al, 2020). In the Self-selected condition, rest breaks were taken according to a participant's preferences regarding when and how long to rest (Figure 3C).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-breaks are short, but relatively frequent rest periods, given in between physical tasks to provide rest and recovery. A review of relevant studies using micro-breaks to reduce fatigue during various tasks was provided by Vijendren et al (2020). To summarize, implemented breaks have ranged from 6 to 120 seconds, with most between 20 and 30 seconds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%