2009
DOI: 10.3103/s0027134909010196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ionosphere over Alaska during a storm period in October 2003: Radio tomography and data obtained with GAIM/IFM ionospheric models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Horvath [2007] and Andreeva et al [2009] are two examples of published scientific publications that used results generated from running IT models at the CCMC. Horvath [2007] made use of the CTIP model [ Codrescu et al , 2008, and references therein] to study the nighttime response of ionosphere to geomagnetic storms, focusing on the Weddell Sea Anomaly.…”
Section: Ionosphere‐thermosphere Models At the Ccmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Horvath [2007] and Andreeva et al [2009] are two examples of published scientific publications that used results generated from running IT models at the CCMC. Horvath [2007] made use of the CTIP model [ Codrescu et al , 2008, and references therein] to study the nighttime response of ionosphere to geomagnetic storms, focusing on the Weddell Sea Anomaly.…”
Section: Ionosphere‐thermosphere Models At the Ccmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining results from CTIP with multiinstrument data measurements, it was shown that equatorward winds generated downwellings and the O/N 2 ratio showed changes in the neutral atmospheric composition. Andreeva et al [2009] compared USU‐GAIM model [ Schunk et al , 2004] results with ionospheric radio tomographic cross sections in Alaska during an October 2003 geomagnetic storm, with one of the main results being that GAIM was observed to diverge from the observed tomographic data with increasing strength of ionospheric disturbances. It should also be noted that the authors of Andreeva et al [2009] are based in Russia, which highlights the international aspect of CCMC user base, whom are not solely restricted to the United States, where the CCMC is located.…”
Section: Ionosphere‐thermosphere Models At the Ccmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present deployment of Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) receivers, both on ground and onboard satellites, and forthcoming new GNSS satellite constellations are opening a new era for ionosphere imaging by greatly increasing the amount of available data for retrieval of time varying three-dimensional electron density distributions (Garcia and Crespon 2008). In recent years, there have been several reconstructions of the ionospheric electron density distributions based on the GNSS observations (Hansen et al 1997;Rius et al 1997;Hernandez-Pajares et al 1998;Howe et al 1998;Bust et al 2000;Liu and Gao 2001;Yin et al 2004;Jin and park 2007;Wen 2007;Wen et al 2007bWen et al , c, 2008Andreeva et al 2009;Lee and Kamalabadi 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%