2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ionosphere of Mars from solar minimum to solar maximum: Dayside electron densities from MAVEN and Mars Global Surveyor radio occultations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three solar irradiance categories are not intended to correspond to any standard definitions of levels of solar activity. Indeed, solar irradiance was generally modest throughout the entire period studied here (e.g., Withers et al., 2021). Instead, they provide useful organizational structures for the work reported here.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three solar irradiance categories are not intended to correspond to any standard definitions of levels of solar activity. Indeed, solar irradiance was generally modest throughout the entire period studied here (e.g., Withers et al., 2021). Instead, they provide useful organizational structures for the work reported here.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In many instances, limitations in spatial and temporal overlap between different measurements have precluded such comparisons. Here, we exploit the excellent observational coverage provided at Mars by the MAVEN spacecraft to compare numerous electron density measurements from two instruments, the Radio Occultation Science Experiment (ROSE, a remote sensing investigation; Felici et al, 2020;Withers et al, 2021Withers et al, , 2018Withers et al, , 2020aWithers et al, , 2020b and Langmuir Probe and Waves (LPW, an in situ instrument; Andersson et al, 2015;Ergun et al, 2021Ergun et al, , 2015Fowler et al, 2015). The aim of this article is to quantify the difference between electron densities measured by these two instruments, then interpret whether that difference is consistent with inherent geophysical variations in the ionosphere of Mars or whether that difference indicates systematic contrasts between the electron density measurements made by these two instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large nightside electron densities of 2-4 × 10 10 m −3 are much greater than usually seen in the nightside ionosphere. Peak electron density generally decreases with increasing solar zenith angle, but the MAVEN ROSE observations of large electron densities of 2-4 × 10 10 m −3 at solar zenith angles of 105°-110° are comparable to the characteristic value of peak electron density at the day/night terminator (solar zenith angle of 90°) of ∼3 × 10 10 m −3 (e.g., Figure 4 of Withers et al [2021]). Zhang et al (1990) examined 50 nightside radio occultation profiles from the Viking spacecraft.…”
Section: Electron Density Valuesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Peak electron density generally decreases with increasing solar zenith angle, but the MAVEN ROSE observations of large electron densities of 2–4 × 10 10 m −3 at solar zenith angles of 105°–110° are comparable to the characteristic value of peak electron density at the day/night terminator (solar zenith angle of 90°) of ∼3 × 10 10 m −3 (e.g., Figure 4 of Withers et al. [2021]). Zhang et al.…”
Section: Electron Density Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar measurements of the ionospheric peaks by RO experiments onboard other Mars missions reveal that the October 2016 ROSE profiles had unusually high peak altitudes. The bottom panel in Figure 4 of Withers et al (2021) heights at ∼125 km at SZA close to 56°. The LPW onboard MAVEN measured the ionospheric peak heights during the deep dip campaign in September 2015 at SZA in the range of 77°-87°.…”
Section: Rose/maven Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%