2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses

Abstract: It is undisputed that presenting a rhythmic stimulus leads to a measurable brain response that follows the rhythmic structure of this stimulus. What is still debated, however, is the question whether this brain response exclusively reflects a regular repetition of evoked responses, or whether it also includes entrained oscillatory activity. Here we systematically present evidence in favor of an involvement of entrained neural oscillations in the processing of rhythmic input while critically pointing out which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
168
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(153 reference statements)
9
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hickok, Farahbod, & Saberi, 2015;Kösem et al, 2018). Similar evidence for an involvement of endogenous oscillatory activity in the field of "entrainment" has been recently summarized elsewhere (Haegens & Zion Golumbic, 2018;Zoefel, ten Oever, & Sack, 2018).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Hickok, Farahbod, & Saberi, 2015;Kösem et al, 2018). Similar evidence for an involvement of endogenous oscillatory activity in the field of "entrainment" has been recently summarized elsewhere (Haegens & Zion Golumbic, 2018;Zoefel, ten Oever, & Sack, 2018).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Vialatte, Maurice, Dauwels, & Cichocki, 2010). However, the underlying mechanism of SSEPs, is still 57 debated (see Zoefel, Ten Oever, & Sack, 2018). While some studies report evidence for entrainment 58 of ongoing brain oscillations by showing an interaction between stimulation and endogenous activity 59 (Notbohm, Kurths, & Herrmann, 2016;Schwab et al, 2006), others found responses to be nothing 60 more than regular repetitions of evoked neural potentials (Capilla, Pazo-Alvarez, Darriba, Campo, & 61 Gross, 2011; C. Keitel, Quigley, & Ruhnau, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of tACS on auditory perception are thought to be mediated by oscillatory neural mechanisms that would be critical for auditory and linguistic processing (Giraud and Poeppel 2012;Peelle and Davis 2012;Zoefel, ten Oever, and Sack 2018). Previous evidence shows that neural activity in the auditory cortices tracks the rhythmic structure of the speech signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%