Between the Cataracts. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Nubian Studies Warsaw University, 27 August-2 September 2006. Part 2010
DOI: 10.31338/uw.9788323533429.pp.465-476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invisible superpower. Review of the geopolitical status of Kushite (Twenty-fifth Dynasty) Egypt at the height of its power and a historiographic analysis of the regime’s legacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, many scholars are inclined to see suggestions of Arabian or Indian elements (personnel, stylistic or artefactual: Arkell 1951; Hofmann 1975) in the Shendi Reach as effects of Egyptianised Hellenism only (Wenig 1978; Zabka 1975). Arguments in favour of Meroitic outreach into the ancient world beyond the African continent include earlier Kushite horse-trainers (occupational specialists) in ancient Assyria (Heidorn 1997), and Meroitic emissaries at Rome (Shinnie 1967) and Constantinople (Peake 2010). Given that Kushites also travelled to the heart of the Persian Empire, and that the Roman Empire engaged in trade with southern Arabia and India, it seems implausible that the Meroitic state had no cultural contact with southern Arabia and India.…”
Section: The Socio-political Nature Of the Meroitic Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many scholars are inclined to see suggestions of Arabian or Indian elements (personnel, stylistic or artefactual: Arkell 1951; Hofmann 1975) in the Shendi Reach as effects of Egyptianised Hellenism only (Wenig 1978; Zabka 1975). Arguments in favour of Meroitic outreach into the ancient world beyond the African continent include earlier Kushite horse-trainers (occupational specialists) in ancient Assyria (Heidorn 1997), and Meroitic emissaries at Rome (Shinnie 1967) and Constantinople (Peake 2010). Given that Kushites also travelled to the heart of the Persian Empire, and that the Roman Empire engaged in trade with southern Arabia and India, it seems implausible that the Meroitic state had no cultural contact with southern Arabia and India.…”
Section: The Socio-political Nature Of the Meroitic Statementioning
confidence: 99%