The Investment Case for E-Government Procurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis

Abstract

In almost every country, government is the largest buyer of works, goods, and services from the private sector. Through the laws and practice of public procurement, governments create competition among firms, thus optimizing public expenditure. However, public procurement is often associated with inefficient allocation of resources and corruption. One method to reduce inefficiencies and abuse in public procurement is the use of e-government procurement (e-GP) platforms. Yet nearly 40% of countries—mostly low- and lower-middle income countries—do not have functioning e-GP platforms. Cost–benefit analysis is used to make the investment case for the development and integration of e-procurement systems in low- and lower middle-income countries. The costs of setting up an e- GP system include an initial investment of $9.03 million, on average, for the planning, design, and build phases spread over a 5-year period. Annual operating and maintenance expenses during pilot and deployment phases are estimated at $1.1 million annually. In total, it is estimated that the net present value of costs to design, build, test, deploy, and operate a robust e-GP system is $16.7 million for a typical low- and middle-income country (at an 8% discount rate). While there are many tangible benefits of e-GP, the benefit assessed here is the reduction in the prices of goods, works, and services paid by government buyers. Using the average percentage reduction in procurement prices of 6.75%, the savings from an e-procurement system are valued at $637.9 million and $5.2 billion for low- and lower middle-income countries, respectively. The benefit–cost ratio of implementing an e-GP system in the average low-income country ranges from 8 to 58 and is 142 to 473 for a lower middle-income country. The size of the procurement market, the reduction in procurement prices, the duration of the implementation process, and the penetration rate of e-GP throughout government are principal determinants in the return on investment.

The Role of Cost Assessment in Enhancing Charismatic Leadership Competence Based on Quadruple Helix Model

“…Cost-benefit analysis in government budgeting is the most common practice (Atory, 2000;Bosio 2023). This analysis links the benefits of each proposed policy to the requirement that the benefits must exceed the sacrifices of the people.…”

“…In other words, it is an analysis to determine practices and policies implemented at the lowest cost. The planning and implementation of public sector development projects such as education, health, social welfare, defense, and others use cost-effectiveness analysis (Pokhilenko, 2021;Bosio, 2023). Cost-benefit analysis is not suitable for the implementation of long-term service projects because service projects offer benefits in terms of the number of beneficiaries but cannot be evaluated in monetary terms.…”

E-Government di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik dan Dampaknya pada Pengembangan Kajian Administrasi Publik

“…Selain meningkatkan efisiensi dan transparansi, e-government juga berkontribusi pada penghematan biaya operasional bagi pemerintah dan masyarakat (Abualese et al, 2019;Bosio et al, 2023). Dengan mengurangi kebutuhan untuk proses manual dan kertas, e-government membantu menurunkan biaya administrasi dan mempercepat waktu pelayanan.…”

Save 4.2 Million Lives and Generate $1.1 Trillion in Economic Benefits for Only $41 Billion: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Most Efficient Policies for the Sustainable Development Goals

“…"The Investment Case for E-government Procurement: A Cost-Benefit Analysis" by Bosio et al (2023) studies the costs and benefits of 11 e-procurement initiatives in lowincome countries like Bangladesh and Rwanda, middle-income countries such as Ukraine and Tunisia, and high-income countries like Italy and South Korea. They show that the cost is likely very low.…”