2013
DOI: 10.5961/jhes.2013.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The investigation of the opinions of teacher candidates about current ethical issues in terms of various variables

Abstract: Bu araştırma öğretmen adaylarının etik ikilemler içeren bazı biyoetik konular hakkında görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla planlanmıştır. Nicel araştırma tekniklerinin kullanıldığı araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2011-2012 yılında Gazi Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 8 farklı bölümden toplam 238 öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Genetik tarama testi, üreme teknolojileri ve ötanazi gibi etik tartışmaların odağında yer alan konular hakkında senaryolar içeren Biyoetik Değer Envanteri ölçme aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Öğretme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, pre-service teachers may think that such preembryo choices will have negative effects on the natural balance and that these practices will be contrary to the natural functioning. This result of the research is similar to the results of studies conducted by Keskin et al (2013) and Meisenberg (2008). In addition, pre-service teachers Duygu TURGUT, Zeha YAKAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, pre-service teachers may think that such preembryo choices will have negative effects on the natural balance and that these practices will be contrary to the natural functioning. This result of the research is similar to the results of studies conducted by Keskin et al (2013) and Meisenberg (2008). In addition, pre-service teachers Duygu TURGUT, Zeha YAKAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Deciding whether a change is good or bad and right or wrong, asking essential questions regarding to what extent and how something should be defended and producing related answers are all covered in the field of bioethics. In modern societies, people not only have to adapt to the scientific and technological developments, but they also have to face the effects of these technologies and to make a choice when needed (Keskin-Samancı, 2009;Keskin, Samancı, & Kurt, 2013). With the use of these technologies, social, legal, cultural and ethical problems arise in terms of human environment and relations with other species, or it is foreseen that it will occur in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the responses to the genetics questionnaire were examined in relation to the variables of region and gender, no significant difference was found; yet, according to the ethical position scale, there is a significant difference between the opinions of the participants with an idealist point of view in favour of female participants (M female =42.22, M male =40.85, t(2.193), p < 0.05). Ozer- Keskin et al (2013) noted that decisions of pre-service teachers generally did not differ by gender but significant differences in the genetic screening test were obtained. Wuensch et al (2002) stated that gender is an influential factor in ethical decision making processes and general results obtained from research show that females have a greater tendency to make ethical decisions than males (Lau & Haug, 2011;Ki et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%