2013
DOI: 10.5772/55058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inverted Pendulum Benchmark in Nonlinear Control Theory: A Survey

Abstract: For at least fifty years, the inverted pendulum has been the most popular benchmark, among others, in nonlinear control theory. The fundamental focus of this work is to enhance the wealth of this robotic benchmark and provide an overall picture of historical and current trend developments in nonlinear control theory, based on its simple structure and its rich nonlinear model. In this review, we will try to explain the high popularity of such a robotic benchmark, which is frequently used to realize experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays the inverted pendulum is considering as a fundamental benchmark in nonlinear control theory [6]. Hence, for an effective verifying of control performance of proposed controller it will be an adequate controlled object.…”
Section: Output Tracking Control Of Inverted Pendulummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays the inverted pendulum is considering as a fundamental benchmark in nonlinear control theory [6]. Hence, for an effective verifying of control performance of proposed controller it will be an adequate controlled object.…”
Section: Output Tracking Control Of Inverted Pendulummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known for their rich dynamics, pendular systems (PS) have been widely used for modelling and as benchmark systems in many areas, namely long-chain molecular physics (Mezić, 2006;Vesely, 2013), control theory (Boubaker, 2013;Kurdekar & Borkar, 2013;Larcombe, 1992), robotics (Ali, Motoi, Heerden, & Kawamura, 2013;Brisilla & Sankaranarayanan, 2015), biomechanics (Barin, 1992;Schiehlen, 2014), building structures (Housner, 1963;Zayas, Low, & Mahin, 1990), chaos and nonlinear dynamics (Gmiterko & Grossman, 2010;Hedrih, 2008;Lobas, 2005;Yu & Bi, 1998), among others (Baker & Blackburn, 2005;Jadlovská, Sarnovskỳ, Vojtek, & Vošček, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point of view is the analysis of the complex dynamics emerging in PS with a large number of links (Awrejcewicz et al, 2008). In all cases, the popularity of PS is due to their seminal properties, revealing phenomena ubiquitous in natural and man-made systems (Boubaker, 2013). Despite the existing models being able to deal with PS of arbitrary number of links, the lack of general tools for dynamical analysis and performance visualisation is recognised (Rivas-Cambero & SausedoSolorio, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a variety of measurements has been conducted for inverted pendulums [4]- [6] (which, according to Boubaker [7], have been used since the 1950s as a control benchmark for its simple structure but nonlinear dynamics) and batch reactors [8]- [10]. All these implementations perform real-world measurements of standard NCSes to proof the validity of their contributions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%