2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
275
2
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
275
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Itoi et al 9 have suggested a threshold of 20% to 25% loss as an indication for a bony reconstructive procedure. Burkhart and colleagues 10 have gone on to popularize the concept of the inverted peareshaped glenoid as a risk factor for failed soft-tissue Bankart procedures. More recent work by Shaha et al 11 has questioned the 20% to 25% threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Itoi et al 9 have suggested a threshold of 20% to 25% loss as an indication for a bony reconstructive procedure. Burkhart and colleagues 10 have gone on to popularize the concept of the inverted peareshaped glenoid as a risk factor for failed soft-tissue Bankart procedures. More recent work by Shaha et al 11 has questioned the 20% to 25% threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Íàëè÷èå êîñòíîãî äåôèöèòà ïå-ðåäíåãî êðàÿ ñóñòàâíîé âïàäèíû âûÿâëÿåòñÿ â 20-30% ñëó÷àåâ ó ïàöèåíòîâ, ïåðåíåñøèõ ïåðâè÷íóþ òðàâìàòè-÷åñêóþ äèñëîêàöèþ [16], äî 90% ñëó÷àåâ -ó ïàöèåíòîâ ñ ðåöèäèâèðóþùèìè âûâèõàìè [17,18]. Ïîâðåaeäåíèÿ Hill-Sachs áûëè îòìå÷åíû â 31-93% ñëó÷àåâ ïåðâè÷íîãî è ïîâòîðíîãî âûâèõîâ ïëå÷à, à òàêaeå â 76% ñëó÷àåâ íåóäà÷íûõ ñòàáèëèçàöèé [19].…”
Section: литературный обзор современных этаповunclassified
“…Lo è ñîàâò. [27] íà îñíîâàíèè îáúåêòèâ-íîé àðòðîñêîïè÷åñêîé êàðòèíû, ïîçâîëÿåò îïðåäåëÿòü àáñîëþòíûå ïîêàçàíèÿ (áîëåå 25% ïëîùàäè ãëåíîèäà) äëÿ âûïîëíåíèÿ êîñòíî-ïëàñòè÷åñêèõ îïåðàöèé.…”
Section: литературный обзор современных этаповunclassified
“…6,7 As a result, it has been recommended that defects greater than 25% of the glenoid should be reconstructed. 4,8,9 Principles of surgical management are directed by the degree of osseous injury to the glenoid, the surgeon's experience, and patient-related factors such as work demands and athletic endeavors. 4,10 Treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder is a balance between gaining glenohumeral stability and minimizing loss of glenohumeral motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%