2006
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/3/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverse source problem for Maxwell's equations

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for resiewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(44 reference statements)
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, He and Romanov [1] show that the location and the polarization of a current dipole in a conducting object can be uniquely determined by measuring at a fixed frequency the magnetic field and its normal derivative on the whole surface. The same result has been obtained by Ammari et al [2] from the knowledge of the tangential component of either the electric or the magnetic field on Γ. Albanese and Monk [3] have characterized which part of a volume source confined in Ω C can be uniquely identified from measurements of the tangential component of the electric field on Γ. Moreover, they also prove uniqueness of the inverse source problem if the source is supported on the surface of a-priori known subdomain contained in Ω C or if it is the sum a finite number of dipole sources.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, He and Romanov [1] show that the location and the polarization of a current dipole in a conducting object can be uniquely determined by measuring at a fixed frequency the magnetic field and its normal derivative on the whole surface. The same result has been obtained by Ammari et al [2] from the knowledge of the tangential component of either the electric or the magnetic field on Γ. Albanese and Monk [3] have characterized which part of a volume source confined in Ω C can be uniquely identified from measurements of the tangential component of the electric field on Γ. Moreover, they also prove uniqueness of the inverse source problem if the source is supported on the surface of a-priori known subdomain contained in Ω C or if it is the sum a finite number of dipole sources.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this section we investigate the uniqueness of the inverse source problem assuming that the unknown source J e is a function in (L 2 (Ω C )) 3 . First we will prove that without additional information, the source cannot be reconstructed from the knowledge of the tangential component of the electric field on Γ.…”
Section: Non-uniqueness Of Volume Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the case of a collection of dipoles, is analysed in Dassios & Fokas (preprint a,b) for spherical and ellipsoidal geometries, respectively. For other related important works, see El Badia & Ha-Duong (2000), Jerbi et al (2002), Nara & Ando (2003), Nolte & Dassios (2005), Albanese & Monk (2006), Peng et al (2006), Nara et al (2007) and Leblond et al (preprint). This paper is organized as follows: the equations needed for EEG and MEG in a three-shell model are derived in §2; this is done for the sake of completeness so that this paper is self-contained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albanese and Monk [28] illustrated that it is not possible to recreate a three-dimensional current based on EEG measurements. This result has been practically demonstrated in Ref.…”
Section: Forward and Inverse Problem For Distributed Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%