2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4898768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverse scattering transform for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with asymmetric boundary conditions

Abstract: The inverse scattering transform (IST) as a tool to solve the initial-value problem for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation with non-zero boundary values ql/r(t)=Al/re2iAl/r2t+il/r as x → ∓∞ is presented in the fully asymmetric case for both asymptotic amplitudes and phases, i.e., with Al ≠ Ar and θl θ r. The direct problem is shown to be well-defined for NLS solutions q(x, t) such that (q(x,t)-q_{l/r}(t) L1,1(R±) with respect to x for all t ≥ 0, and the corresponding analyticity properties of ei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply requiring QnQ±±1=false{fn:ZC:0falsej=nfalse|fjfalse|<false} is not sufficient to guarantee continuity of the eigenfunctions at the branch points ζo±=ifalse(r±Qofalse). On the other hand, similarly to what happens in the continuous case, the stronger summability condition for the AL potential also ensures the eigenfunctions are continuous at the branch points. On the other hand, in general the scattering coefficients have simple poles at the branch points.…”
Section: Direct Scattering Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simply requiring QnQ±±1=false{fn:ZC:0falsej=nfalse|fjfalse|<false} is not sufficient to guarantee continuity of the eigenfunctions at the branch points ζo±=ifalse(r±Qofalse). On the other hand, similarly to what happens in the continuous case, the stronger summability condition for the AL potential also ensures the eigenfunctions are continuous at the branch points. On the other hand, in general the scattering coefficients have simple poles at the branch points.…”
Section: Direct Scattering Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The inverse scattering transform (IST) as a tool to solve the initial‐value problem for the focusing NLS equations on the whole line (<x<) has been known since the pioneer work by Zakharov and Shabat . In recent years, there has been an ongoing effort to extend the IST for potentials with a nonzero background (NZBG), and specifically to boundary conditions of the form: qfalse(x,tfalse)q±false(tfalse)=qoe2iσqo2t+iθ±x±.The defocusing NLS with such nonzero boundary conditions was actually first considered in 1973, and the IST was subsequently investigated and generalized in various works . Many recent papers have dealt with the same problem for the focusing NLS equation, which has turned out to have a richer family of solutions, including breathers and rational solutions such as the celebrated Peregrine and higher order Peregrine solutions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three-component defocusing NLS equation with nonzero boundary conditions was analyzed in Biondini et al 14 by the theory of IST. On the other hand, for the asymmetric nonzero boundary conditions (ie, when the limiting values of the solution at space infinities have different nonzero moduli), the IST for the focusing and defocusing NLS equation were formulated in Demontis et al 15 and Biondini et al, 16 respectively. Our present work was motivated by the long-time asymptotic analysis for the focusing NLS equation developed in Biondini and Mantzavinos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research involves solutions vanishing as x → ±∞ [5,6,16,26,31,33]. Recently there has been much interest in solutions nonvanishing as x → ±∞ [8,10,11]. In this article we study the IST for the focusing NLS equation which is discrete in position and continuous in time, obtained by applying forward differencing to the focusing Zakharov-Shabat system…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%