The Invention of Concurrent Programming

Hansen, Per Brinch

doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3472-0_1

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Concurrent Programming1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Other2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The development of concurrent programming was originally motivated by the need for reliable operating systems. Principles of concurrent programming have shown highly useful, since they apply to any form of parallel computing (HANSEN, 2001).…”

Section: Concurrent Programmingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study and definition of project attributes for selection of testing techniques for concurrent software

Santos¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Concurrent Programmingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study and definition of project attributes for selection of testing techniques for concurrent software

Santos¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Concurrency Paradigms: Competitive, Coordinated, and Collaborative: Which Control Mechanisms are Appropriate?

Gentleman

2015

Int J Parallel Prog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Concurrent computation has been with us for over 50 years, and has become essential today. Concurrency paradigms affect the way we think about parallelism, the programs we try to write, the algorithms we choose, the performance we achieve, the errors we make, and the support mechanisms we need. The paradigms are not equivalent. Although each paradigm can usually be simulated in environments designed for a different paradigm, such a "Turing machine style" proof of computational equivalency does not establish equivalency in terms of the effort required to program solutions, the proclivity for solutions to be error-prone, or the comparable effectiveness of solutions. Two classic concurrency paradigms are reviewed. A third (not so widely recognized) concurrency paradigm is then discussed.

show abstract