2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invasion of language: emergence, change and death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model also does not distinguish the vertical and horizontal transmission of language, and ignores the impact of the behaviour of individual speakers in the population, focusing instead on the expected aggregate behaviour of the population as a whole. Despite these limitations, the model has stimulated a burst of research into the dynamics of language competition and diversity (e.g., Patriarca and Leppänen, 2004;Mira and Paredes, 2005;Wang and Minett, 2005;Schulze and Stauffer, 2006;Stauffer et al, 2006), much of it performed by non-linguists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model also does not distinguish the vertical and horizontal transmission of language, and ignores the impact of the behaviour of individual speakers in the population, focusing instead on the expected aggregate behaviour of the population as a whole. Despite these limitations, the model has stimulated a burst of research into the dynamics of language competition and diversity (e.g., Patriarca and Leppänen, 2004;Mira and Paredes, 2005;Wang and Minett, 2005;Schulze and Stauffer, 2006;Stauffer et al, 2006), much of it performed by non-linguists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To expand the application scope of our language competition model, we propose language inheritance principle II to estimate the inheritance rates of competing languages in cases where sufficient direct data are lacking. This principle is inspired by the well-attested lexical diffusion dynamics in computational linguistics (26,27). This dynamics, derived from the epidemic model (29), uses a logistic curve to describe lexical diffusion, as in Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both monolinguals and bilinguals are taken into account, and the empirical data for this calculation can be extracted from the surveys of speakers' language choices in communities. Language inheritance principle II, inspired by the well-attested lexical diffusion dynamics (26,27), adopts the logistic curve (28) to estimate the inheritance rates of competing languages. This makes the principle applicable in cases lacking sufficient data of speakers' language choices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the reviewed models fail to address crucial social and linguistic aspects. Wang and Minett (2005) made the criticism that these dynamic models do not account for bilingualism, sociolinguistic factors such as social structure, multiple registers of speech, and the effect of heterogeneous strategies, both at the level of individuals and at the level of policymakers. Following this critique, the second group of generalizations of the Abrams-Strogatz model dealt with a more realistic modeling of the process of language shift, in particular, the incorporation of bilingualism.…”
Section: Recent Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%