The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: Final report: Home Office research study 242

Newburn, Tim; Crawford, Adam; Earle, Rod; Goldie, Shelagh; Hale, Chris; Hallam, Angela; Masters, G.; Netten, Ann; Saunders, R. M.; Sharpe, Karen; Uglow, Steve

doi:10.1037/e454752008-001

Cited by 25 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, by excluding ineligible portions of the total population, the proportion of people between the ages of 40-69 rises to 53%. Other research has reported similar results, that the majority of panel members are white, female, professionals over the age of forty: Crawford and Newburn (2002); Biermann and Moulton (2002). Interestingly, this pattern is not simply limited to the UK.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Restorative justice, rhetoric, or reality? Conferencing with young offenders

Stahlkopf

2009

Contemporary Justice Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%

“…Other research has reported similar results. Maxwell and Morris (1993); Newburn et al (2002); Maxwell, Kingi, Robertson, and Morris (2004). 21.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Restorative justice, rhetoric, or reality? Conferencing with young offenders

Stahlkopf

2009

Contemporary Justice Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Referral Order panels provide a platform for young people to share their viewpoints on how the harm caused can be repaired. However, it appears young people involved in such panels merely participate rather than actively engage in the process (Newburn, et al, 2002). On the other hand, as part of the children's hearing system in Scotland young people are not only listened to but what they say is acted upon as they are deemed to be key decision makers in the process (McAra & Young, 1997).…”

Section: Participation In Youth Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Production and secretion of naphthoquinones is mediated by the MFS transporter MFS1 in the entomopathogenic fungus Ophiocordyceps sp. BCC1869

Khaokhajorn

Samipak

Nithithanasilp

et al. 2015

World J Microbiol Biotechnol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A lack of active participation from children and young people in the design and delivery of youth justice services has culminated in the effectiveness of the Youth Justice System being reduced. There has been little independent scrutiny and to add to that strategic direction on how children's voices are or should be accessed in practice. In the light of this, the paper explores the various challenges associated with promoting the active participation of young people who have offended. More specifically, the paper explores the difficulties engaging those who are disengaged as such individuals may perceive the support on offer as unnecessary and intrusive. The paper argues that in order to reconcile a lack of engagement and feelings of disempowerment the priority should be throughout the Youth Justice System to involve young people in decision-making processes. Ideas will be put forward with regard to how youth justice practice could become more participatory and engaging particularly with regard to those who are 'involuntary clients' or in other words difficult to engage. There is a dearth of 'hard' empirical evidence on the effectiveness of participatory approaches in youth justice. However if work with young people who offend is innovative and bespoke to allow for young people's voices to be heard practice could become more effective. But there needs to be the recognition that the ideas put forward in this paper are not 'magic bullets'.

show abstract

“…The research focus, largely dependent on government finance, has hence turned towards the criminal justice response to victimisation, evaluating changes in criminal justice and crime prevention policy in relation to victims (for example, in the U.K., Crawford and Goodey, 2000;Fenwick, 1995;Crawford and Enterkin, 1999;JUSTICE, 1998) and the more recent interest in restorative justice (Holdaway eta/., 200 l;Miers eta/., 2001;Newburn et al, 2002;Shapland eta/., 2004). Since the initial flush of research in the 1980s, there has been a relative dearth of individual research projects on the effects ofvictimisation on individuals or businesses.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

What Do We Know About the Effects of Crime on Victims?

Shapland

Hall

2007

International Review of Victimology

125

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to create an economic measure of the direct and indirect effects of crime, it is necessary to consider the effects of crime on victims. The article reviews the state of research into the effects of crime on individuals, in respect of personal and household victimisation, and the effects of crime on businesses. General population surveys have concentrated upon the common property offences and minor violence and have tended to ignore the dimension of the course of victimisation over time.Longitudinal studies are rare and have concentrated upon serious violent crime. Because of the element of clinical judgment, much work on PTSD is unsuitable for creating an economic measure of effects over all types of crime. There needs to be a marriage of survey methodology with time measures, possibly using a panel design.

show abstract

The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: Final report: Home Office research study 242

Cited by 25 publications

References 0 publications

Restorative justice, rhetoric, or reality? Conferencing with young offenders

Restorative justice, rhetoric, or reality? Conferencing with young offenders

Production and secretion of naphthoquinones is mediated by the MFS transporter MFS1 in the entomopathogenic fungus Ophiocordyceps sp. BCC1869

What Do We Know About the Effects of Crime on Victims?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About