1958
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/71/4/316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intrinsic Variables affecting the Stick-Slip Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
0
4

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
125
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…since the cosine transform vanishes as (3-co) condition for equation (IS) to have a solution with {J ¢ 0 is that fa h (t)dt> f, which is the second inequality of (9). Thus, if the decay process is monotonic,…”
Section: F-h(o)=f-l;h(t)dtmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…since the cosine transform vanishes as (3-co) condition for equation (IS) to have a solution with {J ¢ 0 is that fa h (t)dt> f, which is the second inequality of (9). Thus, if the decay process is monotonic,…”
Section: F-h(o)=f-l;h(t)dtmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This way avalanche like strand movements might be triggered which could release enough frictional heat beyond the stability margin of the cable [5,7]. However, any realistic friction event, including stick-slip, is associated with minimal relative movements on the order of several µm which is the size of the surface asperities of the contact [10,11]. Therefore, sliding amplitudes smaller than say 1 µm are considered irrelevant.…”
Section: Relevant Amplitudes and Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed facts such as the time-dependent increase of static friction during stationary contact [Dokos, 1946;Dieterich, 1972], the continuous reduction of friction from static friction to dynamic friction with ongoing slip displacement [Rabinowicz, 1951 ], the velocity dependence (particularly velocity weakening) of steady state friction, and the continuous change of friction with slip when velocity is changed, all had been discovered and incorporated in the friction law [e.g., Dieterich, 1978] before the work by Dieterich [1979]. Even the concept of memory of the interface, which would be generalized as state variable later [Ruina, 1983], had already been recognized [Rabinowicz, 1958] by then. However, they were all about how and why friction, in the sense of threshold strength, changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%