2017
DOI: 10.1111/resp.13163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Lung Foundation Australia

Abstract: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a diverse group of pulmonary diseases for which accurate diagnosis is critical for optimal treatment outcomes. Diagnosis of ILD can be challenging and a multidisciplinary approach is recommended in international guidelines. The purpose of this position paper is to review the evidence for the use of the multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) in ILD and suggest an approach to its governance and constitution, in an attempt to provide a standard methodology that could be applied acros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(172 reference statements)
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other fibrosing ILD including CTD‐ILD, cHP and asbestosis can also present with a UIP pattern on HRCT and/or histopathology and thus may incorrectly be diagnosed as IPF. Given that treatment of these conditions differs considerably from IPF, it is crucial that any patient with a fibrosing ILD undergo a thorough assessment including a detailed history of environmental exposures as well as specific questioning for subtle symptoms and signs of a CTD . Evaluation of autoantibodies as well as serum precipitins should also be considered in a compatible clinical context .…”
Section: Pharmacological Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other fibrosing ILD including CTD‐ILD, cHP and asbestosis can also present with a UIP pattern on HRCT and/or histopathology and thus may incorrectly be diagnosed as IPF. Given that treatment of these conditions differs considerably from IPF, it is crucial that any patient with a fibrosing ILD undergo a thorough assessment including a detailed history of environmental exposures as well as specific questioning for subtle symptoms and signs of a CTD . Evaluation of autoantibodies as well as serum precipitins should also be considered in a compatible clinical context .…”
Section: Pharmacological Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A multidisciplinary approach to ILDs, including IPAF, increases the likelihood of obtaining an accurate diagnosis for optimal treatment and prognostic definition, reducing the frequency of unclassifiable diagnoses. 16,38 In current practice, a multidisciplinary discussion is necessary to determine whether a patient fulfills the criteria for IPAF; however, IPAF is a research statement, 15 and for now this terminology should not be used in pathologic conclusions. In our practice, some commentaries with recommendations for the investigation of possible underlying autoimmune process are added to the pathologic reports.…”
Section: Role Of Multidisciplinary Discussion In Ipaf Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert ILD multidisciplinary meetings may display considerable heterogeneity in final diagnoses 18 , 22 . To achieve standardisation, based on relatively limited and evolving data supplemented by expert opinion, we have produced a statement 10 outlining the conduct of the multidisciplinary meeting regarding core clinical input, discussion and diagnostic outputs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article summarises two recently published position statements from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and Lung Foundation Australia, outlining the diagnosis 10 and treatment of IPF 11 . They do not represent guidelines per se but are based on current evidence as well as expert opinion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%