The Intersections of Sexuality, Gender, and Race: Identity Research at the Crossroads

Warner, Leah R.; Shields, Stephanie A.

doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0281-4

Cited by 187 publications

(185 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

170

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(For further consideration of cultural work as a historically and geographically situated process, see Banks, Gill and Taylor, 2013. ) In exploding the myth of cultural and creative industries as egalitarian and presenting the reality of inequalities in relation to gender, race, ethnicity and class, her research aligns with the social activism approach of intersectionality (Fielden and Davidson, 2012;Warner and Shields, 2013). For instance, Ros drew attention to the 'family unfriendly' realities of long hours and bulimic patterns of working, which created stark inequalities between male and female cultural workers and those with and without caring responsibilities.…”

Section: Summary Of Seminar Presentations and Of Papers Published In mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The many social-identities that can be explored within intersectionality research mean that researchers have to make informed decisions (Warner and Shields, 2013), about who, how and why, before data collection takes place. Otherwise intersectional research's promises of 'digging deeper' to make visible the intersections of identities (Warner et al, 2013) may be difficult to achieve.…”

Section: Critiques Of Intersectionality In Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Warner and Shields (2013) claim that Bowleg's (2012) study addresses questions posed by Nash (2008, p. 11), such as "Do black women use their multiple identities to interpret the social world or do they deploy one at a time? What determines which identity is foregrounded in a particular moment, or are both always simultaneously engaged?".…”

Section: Crafting a More Nuanced Theory Of Simultaneous Privilege Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Intersectionality, identity and identity work

Corlett

Mavin

2014

Gender in Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher's website (a subscription may be required.) 1 Intersectionality and identity: shared tenets and future research agendas for gender and identity studies Abstract Purpose: This commentary introduces the Special Issue developed from a joint research seminar of the Gender in Management and Identity Special Interest Groups of the British Academy of Management, entitled 'Exploring the intersectionality of gender and identity'. It also presents an introductory literature review of intersectionality for gender in management and identity/identity work researchers. We highlight the similarities and differences of intersectionality and identity approaches, and introduce critiques of intersectional research. We then introduce the three papers in this Special Issue.Design/methodology/approach: We review the intersectionality literature within and outside Management and Organization Studies, and focus attention on three intersectionality Special Issues (Sex Roles, 2008;, and the European Journal of Women's Studies, 2006). Findings:We outline the ongoing debates relating to intersectionality research, including as a framework and/or theory for identity/work, and explore the shared tenets of theories of intersectionality and identity. We highlight critiques of intersectionality research in practice, and consider areas for future research for gender in management and identity researchers. Research limitations/implications:We provide an architecture for researchers to explore intersectionality and to consider issues before embarking on intersectional research. We also highlight areas for future research, including social-identities of disability, class and religion.Originality/Value: Gender in Management: An International Journal invited this Special Issue to make a significant contribution to an under-researched area by reviewing the shared and different languages, and importantly the shared key tenets, of intersectionality, gender, identity and identity work from a multidisciplinary perspective.

show abstract

Section: Summary Of Seminar Presentations and Of Papers Published In mentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Critiques Of Intersectionality In Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Crafting a More Nuanced Theory Of Simultaneous Privilege Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intersectionality, identity and identity work

Corlett

Mavin

2014

Gender in Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From its roots in Black feminist thought, the concept of intersectionality has impressively traversed academic disciplines, including psychology and human development. Within the last decade, numerous scholars have propagated the value of intersectionality for psychological science-as a theoretical and analytical tool for understanding how social location (e.g., race, gender, class, sexual orientation) and systems of power and privilege (e.g., racism, patriarchy, classism, heterosexism) are simultaneously experienced and associated with psychosocial outcomes (Cole, 2009;Bowleg, 2008;Warner & Shields, 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Promises and Pitfalls in the Integration of Intersectionality with Development Science

Syed¹,

Ajayi²

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter, we use the chapters in this volume as source material from which to highlightwhat we view as critical issues in integrating intersectionality with developmental science. Inreading and meditating on the chapters, we abstracted two key themes that were evident, tosome extent, in all of the chapters: 1) the disciplinary use of intersectionality as a theory and 2)the nature of development for an intersectional developmental science. These two themesreflect the current state of the integration of intersectionality with developmental science, inthat they represent both areas of strength and success, but also areas of challenge andweakness.

show abstract

“…Note that these are still the dominant structures that control our social and scholarly discourse. 5,6,7,8 More importantly, nostalgia for a time when these power structures were even more entrenched than they are now is dangerous and, if taken seriously, threatens the participation of people typically marginalized in our scholarly record. Beall's implicit call for a return to this previous imagined reality is by far his most concerning position.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Open access, power, and privilege: A response to “What I learned from predatory publishing”

Swauger¹

2017

crln

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In June 2017, Jeffrey Beall published an opinion piece in Biochemia Medica titled “What I Learned from Predatory Publishers.”1 While there are several elements of this publication that I find inaccurate or problematic, I’m choosing four specific themes within his piece to critique. In the interest of full disclosure, I am Jeffrey Beall’s direct supervisor at the University of Colorado-Denver’s Auraria Library and have been since I began working there in July 2015.

show abstract

The Intersections of Sexuality, Gender, and Race: Identity Research at the Crossroads

Cited by 187 publications

References 39 publications

Intersectionality, identity and identity work

Intersectionality, identity and identity work

Promises and Pitfalls in the Integration of Intersectionality with Development Science

Open access, power, and privilege: A response to “What I learned from predatory publishing”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About