The intersection of sociodemographic characteristics within the nomological network of the triarchic psychopathy model in a forensic sample

Can the triarchic model of psychopathy predict youth offender recidivism?

“…probationers, detainees, and inmates)and based on data from various nations (e.g. Anestis et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2020;Sellbom et al, 2018;Sellbom & Phillips, 2013). It also addresses a relevant research gap and it advances research by using new data and new measures (Boduszek & Debowska, 2016).…”

“…Although the balance of research on triarchic psychopathy has focused on measurement and psychometric properties of triarchic measures, a variety of studies examined the differential roles of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition among clinical/correctional samples and among offending and criminal justice system involvement outcomes (e.g. Anestis et al, 2019;Ruchensky et al, 2018;Sellbom et al, 2018). Studies have shown the triarchic model is correlated with antisocial personality features among female prisoners (Sellbom & Phillips, 2013) and male prisoners (Sellbom et al, 2018), and correlated with antisocial conduct and justice system involvement among persons evaluated at a forensic mental health clinic (Anestis et al, 2019).…”

“…Anestis et al, 2019;Ruchensky et al, 2018;Sellbom et al, 2018). Studies have shown the triarchic model is correlated with antisocial personality features among female prisoners (Sellbom & Phillips, 2013) and male prisoners (Sellbom et al, 2018), and correlated with antisocial conduct and justice system involvement among persons evaluated at a forensic mental health clinic (Anestis et al, 2019). The limited research on using the triarchic model with forensic and clinical youth samples showed that this model converges with other psychopathy measures and is useful to inform developmental models of conduct problems in adolescence (Laurinavičius et al, 2020;Ruchensky et al, 2018;Sica et al, 2019), but to date it is unknown whether the triarchic model is associated with recidivism among justicesystem involved youth.…”

Psychopathy and procrastination: Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy and its relations to active and passive procrastination

“…In line with this approach, the vast majority of research involving the triarchic framework concentrates on the analysis of the specific correlation patterns with external criteria for each dimension. To date, empirical data indicate that the psychopathy facets distinguished in the triarchic framework have distinct nomological networks and can bring different consequences (Anestis et al 2019;Craig et al 2013). In particular, boldness was connected to a lesser extent to criminal and antisocial behavioral manifestations of psychopathy (Anestis et al 2019), higher levels of well-being and stress immunity (Patrick and Drislane 2015), and a diminished tendency to engage in counterproductive organizational behaviors in the workplace (Neo et al 2018).…”

“…To date, empirical data indicate that the psychopathy facets distinguished in the triarchic framework have distinct nomological networks and can bring different consequences (Anestis et al 2019;Craig et al 2013). In particular, boldness was connected to a lesser extent to criminal and antisocial behavioral manifestations of psychopathy (Anestis et al 2019), higher levels of well-being and stress immunity (Patrick and Drislane 2015), and a diminished tendency to engage in counterproductive organizational behaviors in the workplace (Neo et al 2018). In contrast to boldness, meanness and disinhibition were negatively associated with psychological characteristics accompanying successful psychopathy, including socioeconomic status and personality functioning (Persson and Lilienfeld 2019).…”