2019
DOI: 10.1075/jicb.17024.lin
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intersection of language ideologies and language awareness among in-service teachers of emergent bilinguals

Abstract: Important components of the teacher knowledge base are how aware a teacher is of language (including how it is acquired and best taught), as well as their language ideologies. Because a combination of ideologies and awareness may guide many pedagogical decisions, this mixed-methods sequential explanatory study explored prevalent language ideological orientations of educators in a dual language immersion (DLI) context, their degrees of Teacher Language Awareness (TLA), and the relationship between the two. Find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because language opens up possibilities of social identities and community membership for their students, more than just a subject matter, TCs’ self‐reflexivity and critical awareness about language are central to their identities and knowledge base. Resonating with the research on teacher language awareness (Lindahl, ; Lindahl & Henderson, ), CAN led Sara to understand and practice her roles as a language user, teacher, and analyzer and interpret the complex ways language functions as a medium and space for the construction, negotiation, and dissemination of ideologies (Hawkins & Norton, ; Morgan, ). Such an understanding is important in crafting practices to support language learners’ agency and identity while learning and using a new language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because language opens up possibilities of social identities and community membership for their students, more than just a subject matter, TCs’ self‐reflexivity and critical awareness about language are central to their identities and knowledge base. Resonating with the research on teacher language awareness (Lindahl, ; Lindahl & Henderson, ), CAN led Sara to understand and practice her roles as a language user, teacher, and analyzer and interpret the complex ways language functions as a medium and space for the construction, negotiation, and dissemination of ideologies (Hawkins & Norton, ; Morgan, ). Such an understanding is important in crafting practices to support language learners’ agency and identity while learning and using a new language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the most powerful decision makers in the classroom, teachers’ language identities and ideologies underpin their instructional beliefs, tasks, and interactions with students and parents (Kayi‐Aydar et al, ). The dominant ideologies that maintain the societal power relations prevail through the curriculum, although teachers and students can interrogate, challenge, and destabilize these ideologies by developing self‐reflexivity and awareness of dominant language ideologies (Athanases, Banes, & Wong, ; Lindahl & Henderson, ).…”
Section: Language Ideologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section of the survey instrument has been used in several empirical studies (Bernstein et al, in preparation; Fitzsimmons‐Doolan, , ; Fitzsimmons‐Doolan et al., ; Lindhal & Henderson, in preparation) to identify language ideologies through factor analysis. This works by identifying groups of items (called factors) that participants respond to similarly and operationalizing those factors as language ideologies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can "help students critically understand their own lives and worlds, develop agency in making their own language choices, and participate in the building of a more democratic society" (Leeman, 2005, p. 36). Indeed, studies find a relationship between language awareness and language ideologies (Lindahl & Henderson, 2019).…”
Section: Narrative 3: Standard Language Ideologies and Critical Languagmentioning
confidence: 99%