2004
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interrelationship of Neuroticism, Sex, and Stressful Life Events in the Prediction of Episodes of Major Depression

Abstract: Psychosocial adversity interacts both with neuroticism and with sex in the etiology of major depression. The impact of neuroticism on illness risk is greater at high than at low levels of adversity, while the effect of sex on probability of onset is the opposite--greater at low than at high levels of stress. Complete etiologic models for major depression should incorporate interactions between risk factor classes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
566
6
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 674 publications
(623 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
42
566
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the association between neuroticism and cancer survival was stronger among women. Also, the risk of depression is higher among women compared with men (Kendler et al, 2004). A potential explanation for the observed stronger association between neuroticism and cancer survival among women could thus be that high neuroticism involves an increased risk of depression, which may affect the risk of death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, the association between neuroticism and cancer survival was stronger among women. Also, the risk of depression is higher among women compared with men (Kendler et al, 2004). A potential explanation for the observed stronger association between neuroticism and cancer survival among women could thus be that high neuroticism involves an increased risk of depression, which may affect the risk of death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is also possible that the association is related to depression. In an earlier study using a population-based sample, neuroticism was reported to be a significant risk factor for major depression (Kendler et al, 2004). Furthermore, a number of prospective studies have reported a statistically significant association between depression (higher degree of depressive symptoms or psychiatrically diagnosed depression) and survival in patients with various types of cancer (Hjerl et al, 2003;Goodwin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that carriers of the s-allele have an elevated risk of depression in the context of environmental adversity. 73,285,286 Furthermore, in rhesus macaques, which have the same 5-HTTLPR length variations as humans, the s-allele is associated with decreased 5-HTergic function, indicated by lower CSF 5-HIAA concentrations, only in monkeys reared in stressful conditions. 287 In addition, s-allele carriers showed increased activation of the amygdala in response to fearful or threatening stimuli.…”
Section: Biopsychological Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…69,70 Depression has been associated with higher scores on neuroticism (N) and the temperament dimension harm avoidance (HA), the tendency to respond to signals of adverse stimuli with behavioral inhibition. [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Also, low self-directedness (the ability to regulate one's behavior and commit to chosen goals; SD) and cooperativeness (the ability to identify with and accept other people; C) have been found in depressed patients, 77,79 which may increase after treatment. 80 SD and C have been associated with 5-HTergic activity.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, particularly in the case of major depression, there is evidence that neuroticism interacts with psychosocial stress to yield psychopathology (Kendler et al, 2003(Kendler et al, , 2004. As such, elucidating the genetics of personality traits such as neuroticism may contribute to a better understanding of the etiology of these disorders (Bienvenu and Stein, 2003;Fullerton et al, 2003;Reif and Lesch, 2003;Van Gestel and Van Broeckhoven, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%