1956
DOI: 10.1080/00291463.1956.10780855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interpretation of Sociometric Status Scores in the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children should learn how to deal with sociometric indifference, how to get along and work with persons whom they do not choose and who do not choose them. 4. Popularity is not coextensive with adequate social adjustment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Children should learn how to deal with sociometric indifference, how to get along and work with persons whom they do not choose and who do not choose them. 4. Popularity is not coextensive with adequate social adjustment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of classmates in making certain important personal decisions is persuasive. 4. A pupil's average of ratings made and received is more reflective of his acceptance or rejection by the group than his mid-score of ratings made and received.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Hare's (1976) definition of cohesiveness in socioemotional terms was employed, Tziner and Vardi claim that it is likely that the soldiers' choice of crewmates also reflects the advantage of working with potentially capable peers. New soldiers, anxious about their future organizational performance as individuals and crew members, might base their choices on instrumental, as well as emotional considerations (see : Bjerstedt, 1956;Borgatta, Couch, & Bales, 1954;Hollander, 1956;Secord & Backman, 1974). The moderating effect of group ability did not readily lend itself to explanation in this study, as the amount of objective information available to candidates regarding the ability of the others was not manipulated prior to the sociometric selection procedure.…”
Section: The Effects Of Interpersonal Communication Social Influence ...mentioning
confidence: 99%