2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijaape.2016.077893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interpretation differences of verbal probability expressions in principles-based accounting standards: evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Salleh et al (2011) compare native Chinese speaking and native English-speaking accounting students in UK universities and found that native culture and language are not important factors in the explanation of differences between accounting students in their interpretation of verbal probability expressions (VPE). However, a more recent study by Tang and Yang (2016) reports a high degree of consistency in the VPE interpretations among Chinese auditors, while students' interpretations tend to exhibit lower levels of consensus.…”
Section: Impact Of Conservatism and Secrecymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, Salleh et al (2011) compare native Chinese speaking and native English-speaking accounting students in UK universities and found that native culture and language are not important factors in the explanation of differences between accounting students in their interpretation of verbal probability expressions (VPE). However, a more recent study by Tang and Yang (2016) reports a high degree of consistency in the VPE interpretations among Chinese auditors, while students' interpretations tend to exhibit lower levels of consensus.…”
Section: Impact Of Conservatism and Secrecymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, Salleh et al (2011) compare nativeChinese speaking and native English-speaking accounting students in United Kingdom universities and found that native culture and language are not important factors in the explanation of differences between accounting students in their interpretation of verbal probability expressions (VPE). However, a more recent study byTang & Yang (2016) reports a high degree of consistency in the VPE interpretations among Chinese auditors, while students' interpretations tend to exhibit lower levels of consensus. Moreover, our use of the latest available version of the VSM (2013) for determining the cultural scores for Tunisia and Egypt follows the same pattern as the extension of the IBM model by M. Bond in China called the Chinese Value Survey (CVS) based on students' responses and…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies refer to the various national accounting standards (Chesley, 1986;Amer, Hackenbrack and Nelson, 1994;Simon, 2002). The interpretation of VPEs used in IFRS has also been discussed in several studies Richter, 2003, 2004;Doupnik and Riccio, 2006;Teixeira and Silva, 2009;Salleh et al, 2011aSalleh et al, , 2011bChand, Cummings and Patel, 2012;Tang and Yang, 2016;Huerta, Petrides and Braun, 2016).…”
Section: Review Of Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%