2019
DOI: 10.1075/eww.00031.han
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay of the national, regional, and global in standards of English

Abstract: An accent recognition survey was designed and distributed among respondents from the anglophone Caribbean with the aim of finding out whether they can recognize different standard accents of English as spoken by newscasters from five Caribbean countries, namely Jamaica, St Kitts and Nevis, Dominica, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago. The results revealed that there is a general difficulty in placing Caribbean newscaster accents in the correct country. The only exception was a Trinidadian a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of spoken language use have mostly been concerned with variation at the morphosyntactic (e.g., Deuber, 2014 ; Mair, 2009 ) and segmental phonological level (e.g., Ahlers & Meer, 2019 ; Irvine-Sobers, 2018 ; Kraus, 2017 ; Leung, 2013 ; Rosenfelder, 2009 ) and provided consistent evidence of distinct (often Creole-influenced) features and local innovations, especially at the phonological level, and an increasing reliance on these endocentric forms of English. Nevertheless, accents of standard English in the region are also often characterized by some degree of exonormative influence: while American and British influences have a prominent role in some domains, such as radio newscasting across different Caribbean islands ( Deuber & Leung, 2013 ; Hänsel & Deuber, 2019 ; Hänsel, 2021 ; Westphal, 2017 ), these influences seem to be smaller on a more general level and standard British English mostly tends to be the somewhat stronger exonormative force (see Leung, 2013 on Trinidad; Rosenfelder, 2009 on Jamaica). 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of spoken language use have mostly been concerned with variation at the morphosyntactic (e.g., Deuber, 2014 ; Mair, 2009 ) and segmental phonological level (e.g., Ahlers & Meer, 2019 ; Irvine-Sobers, 2018 ; Kraus, 2017 ; Leung, 2013 ; Rosenfelder, 2009 ) and provided consistent evidence of distinct (often Creole-influenced) features and local innovations, especially at the phonological level, and an increasing reliance on these endocentric forms of English. Nevertheless, accents of standard English in the region are also often characterized by some degree of exonormative influence: while American and British influences have a prominent role in some domains, such as radio newscasting across different Caribbean islands ( Deuber & Leung, 2013 ; Hänsel & Deuber, 2019 ; Hänsel, 2021 ; Westphal, 2017 ), these influences seem to be smaller on a more general level and standard British English mostly tends to be the somewhat stronger exonormative force (see Leung, 2013 on Trinidad; Rosenfelder, 2009 on Jamaica). 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2. A notable exception is spoken English in the Bahamas, which is more influenced by American English due to the country’s long-lasting ties with the American mainland (Kraus, 2017). Little systematic research exists on accent variation in English in the smaller Caribbean countries and potential influences from British and American English outside the domain of radio newscasting (Hänsel & Deuber, 2019; Hänsel, 2021. ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the affordances of digital writing may destabilize the norms of the age of literacy (Androutsopoulos, 1998). Taken together, discursive complexity that involves the continuing transnational prestige of exogenous norms of (different kinds of) English and the important functions of Kriol as index of local, non‐Western, non‐standardized culture make it unlikely that there will be one national prestige form of language in Caribbean settings (for empirical observations on the variability of standard forms in the Caribbean, see Hänsel & Deuber, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of attitudes towards standardized Englishes in Caribbean settings is a newer phenomenon (Deuber & Leung, 2013; Hackert, 2016; Mühleisen, 2001; Wilson, 2017), which is interested in the emergence of endonormative standards of English and in the attitudes towards them (see Meer et al., 2019 on Trinidad or Perez & Schmalz, 2021 on St. Kitts;). It is noticeable that influences from local, national and transnational spaces seem to intermingle in these settings, leading to indications of national norms in some settings (potentially in Trinidad; see Hänsel & Deuber, 2019; Wilson, 2017) but also to a lack of clear conceptions of Caribbean varieties as indices of nationality and to possible simultaneous attributions of value to British, US as well as Caribbean features (Hackert et al., 2020; Mair, 2017, section 3; Meer & Deuber, 2020).…”
Section: Language Attitudes and Language Ideologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a recent movement to record lesser‐known varieties of English (Schreier et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2015), a strong focus has so far been laid on the larger and more populous islands, especially Jamaica, Trinidad, and the Bahamas. Little systematic empirical research exists on dialectological, sociolinguistic, and language attitudinal aspects in the smaller islands of the Eastern Caribbean, such as Dominica, Grenada, or St. Kitts, especially when it comes to standardized varieties of English (but see Deuber et al., 2021; Hänsel & Deuber, 2019; Hänsel, 2021; Hänsel et al., 2022; Perez & Schmalz, 2021; Schmalz, 2023 fc. ; Walker & Meyerhoff, 2020 for recent exceptions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%