The interplay of public and private spaces in internet access

Abstract

ACCESSThe creation of public internet access facilities is one of the principal policy instruments adopted by governments in addressing 'digital divide' issues. The lack of plans for ongoing funding, in North America at least, suggests that this mode is regarded mainly as transitional, with private, home-based access being perceived as superior. The assumption apparently is that as domestic internet penetration rates rise, public access facilities will no longer be needed. Central to this issue are the varied characteristics of publicly provided and privately owned access sites and their implications for non-employment internet activities. What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of these two access modes? More fundamentally, how do people conceptualize public and private spaces and how does this perception influence their online activities? Finally, why do people choose one over the other, and how do they navigate between the two? This article attempts to answer these questions by drawing on data generated within the Everyday Internet Project, a 'neighborhood ethnography' of internet usage. It argues that the conventional view of private and public access facilities as immiscible, fixed alternatives is inadequate. Rather than 'pure' types, they are better understood as offering hybrid spaces whose identity and character are fluid, perceived differently by individuals in light of the activities being performed, life experiences, infrastructure and architecture. The picture emerging from our study is one where public and private access modes intertwine with each other in a variety of ways, their combination offering significant additional value for many users. From a public policy perspective, these findings suggest that if universal access is to be achieved, there is a continuing need for publicly supported broadspectrum facilities with integrated technical support and learning opportunities, even if domestic penetration rates approach that of the telephone.

The Experience of Connectivity

“…the questions in the surveys by the Pew Internet Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org/, or in Oxford Internet Survey 2007 Report: The Internet in Britain, Dutton & Helsper 2007). Similarly, while there have been many surveys of the extent to which people have Internet access, as part of the research on the digital divide (Viseu et al 2006;Devins et al 2008), this work tends to focus on technical measures of access, rather than on the experience of being connected or on the degree to which speed of connection may or may not improve access (Kwak et al 2004;Anderson 2008).…”

Creating a Digital Bridge: Lessons and policy implications from a technology access and distribution program for low-income job seekers

“…Rhinesmith and Kennedy use the term "digital equity ecosystems" as way to describe these complex "interactions between individuals, populations, communities, and their larger sociotechnical environments that all play a role in shaping the digital inclusion work in local communities to promote more equitable access to technology and social and racial justice" (2020, p. 6). These infomediaries and organizations not only help individuals get online but support community connection and social change (Eubanks, 2007;Rhinesmith, 2012Rhinesmith, , 2016Viseu et al, 2006).…”

Young children’s literacy in the activity space of the library: A geosemiotic investigation

“…Although Manguel does not consider library design from a child's perspective, this raises the question of how the particular risks and benefits of, and for children -different from adults -may impact on their relationships with library spaces. Viseu et al (2006), in a study of internet users in different physical locations, argue that the concept of a 'hybrid space' has much greater utility than the notion of private and public spaces as completely separate categories. Consistent with Manguel, they describe the library as a 'private-in-public' space (Viseu et al, 2006: 648).…”