2020
DOI: 10.1108/ict-03-2020-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay of psychological contract breach, stress and job outcomes during organizational restructuring

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to study the impact of psychological contract breach and employee stress on job outcomes such as job involvement and organizational citizenship behaviour in the Indian banking sector, with special reference to State Bank of India. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey was administered. Data was collected from employees of a bank, which has undergone a merger. Validity tests were carried out to confirm the accuracy of the measurement variables. Regression analysis was used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedural justice theory states that a person who receives constant abuse and humiliation from a supervisor will certainly believe that an organization is not doing enough to create and enforce measures to protect the aggrieved employee or punish rogue supervisors (Agarwal et al, 2021b). As a result, an employee who is exposed to consistent supervisory abuse will display knowledge hiding behavior, which will not do any good in stopping mistreatment but instead will be like supporting the perpetrator of the supervisory abuse (Arunachalam, 2021).…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Psychological Contract Breachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedural justice theory states that a person who receives constant abuse and humiliation from a supervisor will certainly believe that an organization is not doing enough to create and enforce measures to protect the aggrieved employee or punish rogue supervisors (Agarwal et al, 2021b). As a result, an employee who is exposed to consistent supervisory abuse will display knowledge hiding behavior, which will not do any good in stopping mistreatment but instead will be like supporting the perpetrator of the supervisory abuse (Arunachalam, 2021).…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Psychological Contract Breachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the employees' and the employer's hopes are met, which creates a connection between the two. In today's world, organizations have fewer resources and are under more pressure to stay profitable and competitive (Arunachalam, 2020). Individuals expect a return on their contributions to the organization as a result (Balabanova et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypothesis Development Perceived Cont...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals expect a return on their contributions to the organization as a result (Balabanova et al, 2019). PBC is always higher when an employer doesn't do what they said they would do, either directly or indirectly (Arunachalam, 2020). PBC is when an organization doesn't live up to some of the promises it made about an employment arrangement, either directly or indirectly (Morrison and Robinson, 1997).…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypothesis Development Perceived Cont...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both parties' (employer and employees) prospects are equally satisfied, bringing a mutual bond between the parties ( Ma, Liu, Lassleben, & Ma, 2019 ). Organizations operate in a heightening situation of limited resources and pressure to keep competitive and sustainable ( Arunachalam, 2020 ). It results in employees developing expectations in return for their contribution to the organization ( Balabanova, Ehrnrooth, Koveshnikov, & Efendiev, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in employees developing expectations in return for their contribution to the organization ( Balabanova, Ehrnrooth, Koveshnikov, & Efendiev, 2019 ). When the respective organization delays giving back to employees what they either directly or explicitly promised, then the sense of psychological contract breach is activated ( Arunachalam, 2020 ). Morrison and Robinson (1997) defined psychological contract breach as an organizational failure to meet some of the obligations which understood employment arrangement either implicitly or explicitly.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%