The Interplay of IT Users’ Coping Strategies: Uncovering Momentary Emotional Load, Routes, and Sequences

Abstract

Despite the positive aspects of information technology (IT) use, it is common for users to experience negative IT incidents. Examples of negative IT incidents include getting lost in an unfamiliar country due to a dysfunctional map application and missing a monetary insurance benefit due to the failure of an activity tracker application. Such incidents can harm IT providers by giving rise to user dissatisfaction, discontinued use, switching, and negative word-of-mouth. To minimize this harm, it is important to understand how users cope after negative incidents. Specifically, information systems (IS) researchers have called for research that uncovers the complex interplay of IT users' coping strategies (e.g., users' coping efforts after employing one strategy and combinations of several consecutive strategies). To address these calls, we conducted a mixed methods study that examined mobile application users' coping strategies after highly negative incidents. We developed a model that explains how users navigate between problem-focused strategies, emotion-focused strategies, and appraisals. As theoretical contributions, we identify coping sequences and distinct routes from the coping strategies, uncover the role of momentary emotional load, and present IT-specific insights. As practical implications, we identify favorable and unfavorable coping strategies and sequences from both the IT providers' and the users' perspectives.

How social enterprises gain cognitive legitimacy in the post-pandemic period? Social welfare logic and digital transformation

“…Through the significant mediating impact of digital transformation as transformational logic, our study confirmed the H3c. On the one hand, our findings enriched the institutional perspective of social enterprise legitimacy by adding new interpretations (Salo et al , 2020). We have supplemented and interpreted the digital transformation literature on how digital technology can influence the legitimacy of hybrid organizations (Fitzgerald et al , 2014; Annarelli et al , 2021).…”

“…However, there is a core premise assumption of related studies that cognitive legitimacy can only obtain through an established approach (Chell et al , 2010; Dart, 2004), where digital transformation has not been considered as the transformation logic and integrated into the theoretical framework from the institutional perspective (Salo et al , 2020). Especially in confront new challenges from a post-pandemic context, it is difficult for social enterprises to amplify company impact only by following an established approach.…”

Formation and Mitigation of Technostress in the Personal Use of IT

“…Second, we chose to employ the literature on IT affordances and self-regulation in place of other potentially relevant literature. For example, we acknowledge that the literature on coping with IT (e.g., Beaudry and Pinsonneault 2005;Salo et al 2020;) could offer insights into technostress mitigation, especially on emotions. However, we estimated the IT affordance literature would be more precise in focusing on the IT and user components simultaneously and the self-regulation literature would better extract the main components needed for changing one's use practices.…”

Technostress and Employee Performance Nexus During COVID-19: Training and Creative Self-Efficacy as Moderators

“…The training is considered an effective stress coping strategy (Skinner et al, 2003;Salo et al, 2020). Training instills the capability to handle the challenges arising out of work.…”