The Interplay of Empathy and Individualism in Support for Social Welfare Policies

Abstract

Public support for government welfare programs is grounded in two potentially conflicting factors: a belief in individualism which undermines support for welfare assistance and the capacity for empathy which potentially enhances support. However, empathy is an expensive psychological commodity subject to pervasive up‐ and down‐regulation. This article examines the degree to which a belief in individualism affects the expression of compassionate support for a person in need among those with the capacity for empathy. In two online survey experiments, empathic ability powerfully increases support for a welfare recipient and social welfare policies when it does not conflict with individualism. But, empathic ability decreases compassion and support for government welfare among strong individualists. Evidence that individualists down‐regulate empathy for someone in need of government assistance is consistent with the conservative view that welfare promotes dependency and undermines individual agency. In contrast, charitable assistance is not associated with long‐term dependency, and we find that empathy is up‐regulated by strong individualists to generate charitable support for the same individual to whom they denied government assistance. The up‐ and down‐regulation of empathy in response to someone in need of government welfare helps illuminate the sharp divisions over social welfare policy among the American public.

Anxiety Reduces Empathy Toward Outgroup Members But Not Ingroup Members

“…Empathy, deeply rooted in human nature, emerged in our primate ancestors (Premack and Woodruff, 1978) and inscribed in our neural architecture (de Waal, 2008). Despite its centrality in motivating people to help others (Dovidio et al, 2006), political psychologists have mostly just begun to theorize about the role human empathy plays in political attitude formation (for exceptions, see Feldman and Steenbergen, 2001; Feldman et al, 2013; Sirin et al, 2016). Scholarship in neuroscience demonstrates that people are more likely to take the perspective of individuals who are part of their ingroup than they are from those who come from outgroups (Adams et al, 2010; de Waal, 2008).…”

When do stories change our minds? Narrative persuasion about social problems

“…But, again, this may not be true. Exposed to a description of a person in economic need, research subjects with strong individualistic beliefs blamed the person for his plight and opposed government action on poverty (Feldman, Huddy, Wronski, & Lown, 2019). This is not surprising.…”

Screw Those Guys: Polarization, Empathy, and Attitudes About Out‐Partisans

“…This is especially true for people who have high levels of empathic ability —the capacity to interpret the feelings of others. Emerging evidence from the field of political psychology indicates that our ability to read the emotions of others (i.e., empathic ability), along with our ability to regulate the emotions that result from empathizing (Eisenberg & Fabes, 1990), are important factors in determining how we respond emotionally to politics, particularly how politics affects people (Feldman, Huddy, Wronski, & Lown, 2020).…”