2017
DOI: 10.1177/0958928717719198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay of educational and labour market institutions and links to relative youth unemployment

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most studied factors associated with youth unemployment is the level of employment protection (e.g. Breen 2005;Brzinsky-Fay 2017;de Lange et al 2014;Russell and O'Connell 2001;Wolbers 2007). It is essential to distinguish between employment protection for regular and for temporary contracts due to the different ways in which they affect young people (Gebel and Giesecke 2016): Employment protection for regular workers is associated with direct and indirect costs of dismissal, which might dissuade employers from hiring young people due to higher anticipated costs in case of a mismatch (Skedinger 2010).…”
Section: Unemployed Neetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most studied factors associated with youth unemployment is the level of employment protection (e.g. Breen 2005;Brzinsky-Fay 2017;de Lange et al 2014;Russell and O'Connell 2001;Wolbers 2007). It is essential to distinguish between employment protection for regular and for temporary contracts due to the different ways in which they affect young people (Gebel and Giesecke 2016): Employment protection for regular workers is associated with direct and indirect costs of dismissal, which might dissuade employers from hiring young people due to higher anticipated costs in case of a mismatch (Skedinger 2010).…”
Section: Unemployed Neetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growth in precarious employment and the related precarity it inevitably brings to wider social life, the issue of economic security and job stability is of paramount importance to young workers. Not only is a smooth transition from school to work related to future occupational success (Brzinsky-Fay, 2017), the prospect of having a secure job is also subjectively very important. In a recent survey on work orientations, more than 90% of young workers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States said that having a job was (very) important to them personally.…”
Section: Precarity: Deteriorating Labor Market Opportunities For Younmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed analysis of these data shows that youth unemployment rates were lower in countries with a collective skill formation regime, that is, those with a high level of firm involvement in the provision of initial vocational training and a strong public commitment to vocational training (Busemeyer & Trampusch, 2012). Indeed, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria and Denmark had much lower youth unemployment rates, as shown in Figure 1 (Biavaschi et al, 2012;Brzinsky-Fay, 2017;Busemeyer & Iversen, 2012;Busemeyer & Thelen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%