2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2209.14307
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interplay between the Dark Matter Axion and Primordial Black Holes

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] suggests a heavier axion mass window, m a ∼O(0.2-80) meV, with the discrepancy that can be traced back on different results of the scaling of the spectral index [37]. The allowed window of QCD axion mass comprising all of the DM abundance significantly alters on invoking non-standard cosmology [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] or during an era of primordial black hole domination [45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] suggests a heavier axion mass window, m a ∼O(0.2-80) meV, with the discrepancy that can be traced back on different results of the scaling of the spectral index [37]. The allowed window of QCD axion mass comprising all of the DM abundance significantly alters on invoking non-standard cosmology [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] or during an era of primordial black hole domination [45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaporating PBHs can directly produce all the particles within and beyond the Standard Model (SM), for example, gravitons [14] and supersymmetric particles, even when their masses are much larger than the temperature of the Universe. It is also shown that the Hawking radiation can be responsible for the generation of baryon asymmetry [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and have impacts on the axion dark matter models [22][23][24]. A small PBH might induce the Higgs vacuum decay as well [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], where its physical interpretation and the validity of the calculation are still under debate [33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Jcap01(2023)027mentioning
confidence: 99%