2013
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.786721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between presentation material and decision mode for complex choice preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If one sees UT as a form of unconscious goal pursuit, then one should also assume (see the work by Marien et al, 2012; referred to earlier) that UT uses at least some attention or some processing capacity. This indeed seems to be the case (Abadie, Villejoubert, et al, 2013;McMahon et al, 2011;Strick et al, 2011).…”
Section: Ut Does Require Attentionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…If one sees UT as a form of unconscious goal pursuit, then one should also assume (see the work by Marien et al, 2012; referred to earlier) that UT uses at least some attention or some processing capacity. This indeed seems to be the case (Abadie, Villejoubert, et al, 2013;McMahon et al, 2011;Strick et al, 2011).…”
Section: Ut Does Require Attentionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These findings are hence not conclusive and it is yet not possible to draw strong conclusions about the benefits of a specific presentation format on each decision mode. However, it is worthwhile noting that the use of numerical stimuli to characterise the options might have handicapped distracted participants since conscious thought is best suited for applying strict rules such as those needed to do arithmetic calculations (Abadie, Villejoubert, et al, 2013;. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the unconscious-thought paradigm favours on-line decisions made during information acquisition (Lassiter, Lindberg, Gonzalez-Vallejo, Bellezza, & Phillips, 2009;Waroquier, Marchiori, Klein, & Cleeremans, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In another set of studies, we examined the effect of the material (e.g., visual or numerical) used to present decision information (Abadie, Villejoubert, Waroquier, & Vallée-Tourangeau, 2013). We found that the presentation material is a moderating factor of the quality of decisions made after deliberation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study (Abadie, Villejoubert, et al, 2013) confirmed these results by showing an advantage of conscious deliberation compared not only to a period of distraction but also to an immediate decision. Moreover, choice tasks distinguished options described with quantitative or qualitative attributes.…”
Section: Deliberation Helps When Information Can Be Processed Systemamentioning
confidence: 69%